Overall
- Kennewick-Richland
- 100.1
- Albuquerque
- 95.5
Diff -4.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Albuquerque is 4.5% less expensive than Kennewick-Richland.
Albuquerque, NM is 4.5% less expensive than Kennewick-Richland, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.5 vs 100.1). A $100,000 salary in Kennewick-Richland buys about the same as $95,471 in Albuquerque; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:NM 100.1→95.5
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Albuquerque, NM is 4.5% less expensive than Kennewick-Richland, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 4.5-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Kennewick-Richland is above 100 while Albuquerque is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Services leads the difference, with Albuquerque 15.7 points lower than Kennewick-Richland. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Kennewick-Richland to $95,471 in Albuquerque, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Kennewick-Richland and Albuquerque share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 2.8 to 4.5 RPP points. Kennewick-Richland remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 28.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (12.9 to 15.7 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Kennewick-Richland RPP | Albuquerque RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 94.2 | 97.0 | 2.8 points Albuquerque higher |
| 2012 | 99.3 | 99.6 | 0.3 points Albuquerque higher |
| 2016 | 97.4 | 96.6 | 0.8 points Kennewick-Richland higher |
| 2020 | 99.8 | 94.2 | 5.6 points Kennewick-Richland higher |
| 2024 | 100.1 | 95.5 | 4.5 points Kennewick-Richland higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff -4.5 RPP
Diff -8.9 RPP
Diff -15.7 RPP
Diff -5.7 RPP
| Category | Kennewick-Richland | Albuquerque | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.1 | 95.5 | -4.5 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 96.1 | -8.9 |
| Services | 93.6 | 77.9 | -15.7 |
| Rents | 94.8 | 89.2 | -5.7 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Kennewick-Richland would need to be in Albuquerque for the same purchasing power:
| In Kennewick-Richland | In Albuquerque | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $47,735 | $-2,265 |
| $75,000 | $71,603 | $-3,397 |
| $100,000 | $95,471 | $-4,529 |
| $150,000 | $143,206 | $-6,794 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.1 → 95.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Albuquerque is 4.5% less expensive than Kennewick-Richland. The overall cost index is 95.5 vs 100.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Kennewick-Richland has the same purchasing power as $95,471 in Albuquerque. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Kennewick-Richland are indexed at 94.8 while Albuquerque is at 89.2 (national average = 100). Kennewick-Richland has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.