Overall
- Kankakee
- 96.4
- Walla Walla
- 98.5
Diff +2.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Walla Walla is 2.2% more expensive than Kankakee.
Walla Walla, WA is 2.2% more expensive than Kankakee, IL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.5 vs 96.4). A $100,000 salary in Kankakee buys about the same as $102,204 in Walla Walla; the largest component gap is goods.
RPP parity plate
Pair IL:WA 96.4→98.5
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +2.1 RPP
Diff +11.4 RPP
Diff +4.9 RPP
Diff -6.3 RPP
| Category | Kankakee | Walla Walla | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.4 | 98.5 | +2.1 |
| Goods | 93.6 | 105.0 | +11.4 |
| Services | 89.4 | 94.3 | +4.9 |
| Rents | 92.9 | 86.6 | -6.3 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Goods creates the largest separation: Walla Walla is 11.4 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Walla Walla, WA is 2.2% more expensive than Kankakee, IL, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.1-point overall gap.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $102,204 in Walla Walla as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Kankakee, then replace the national basket with your own.
What a salary in Kankakee would need to be in Walla Walla for the same purchasing power:
| In Kankakee | In Walla Walla | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,102 | +$1,102 |
| $75,000 | $76,653 | +$1,653 |
| $100,000 | $102,204 | +$2,204 |
| $150,000 | $153,307 | +$3,307 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.4 → 98.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Kankakee and Walla Walla share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 3.9 to 2.1 RPP points. Walla Walla remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 35.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (30.8 to 4.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Kankakee RPP | Walla Walla RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 99.5 | 95.6 | 3.9 points Kankakee higher |
| 2012 | 99.2 | 95.1 | 4.0 points Kankakee higher |
| 2016 | 97.6 | 96.3 | 1.3 points Kankakee higher |
| 2020 | 90.6 | 95.2 | 4.6 points Walla Walla higher |
| 2024 | 96.4 | 98.5 | 2.1 points Walla Walla higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Walla Walla is 2.2% more expensive than Kankakee. The overall cost index is 98.5 vs 96.4 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Kankakee has the same purchasing power as $102,204 in Walla Walla. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Kankakee are indexed at 92.9 while Walla Walla is at 86.6 (national average = 100). Kankakee has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.