Kankakee vs Walla Walla

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Walla Walla is 2.2% more expensive than Kankakee.

2.2% more expensive

Walla Walla, WA is 2.2% more expensive than Kankakee, IL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.5 vs 96.4). A $100,000 salary in Kankakee buys about the same as $102,204 in Walla Walla; the largest component gap is goods.

  • Overall RPP 96.4 (Kankakee) vs 98.5 (Walla Walla)
  • $100k in Kankakee ≈ $102,204 purchasing power in Walla Walla
  • Goods drives the gap (+11.4 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair IL:WA 96.4→98.5

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE IL × WA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Kankakee
96.4
Walla Walla
98.5
Goods
Kankakee
93.6
Walla Walla
105.0
Services
Kankakee
89.4
Walla Walla
94.3
Rents
Kankakee
92.9
Walla Walla
86.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Goods creates the largest separation: Walla Walla is 11.4 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Walla Walla, WA is 2.2% more expensive than Kankakee, IL, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.1-point overall gap.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $102,204 in Walla Walla as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Kankakee, then replace the national basket with your own.

Kankakee
96.4
Cost Index
Walla Walla
98.5
Cost Index

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Kankakee would need to be in Walla Walla for the same purchasing power:

In Kankakee In Walla Walla Difference
$50,000 $51,102 +$1,102
$75,000 $76,653 +$1,653
$100,000 $102,204 +$2,204
$150,000 $153,307 +$3,307
$ in Kankakee = in Walla Walla

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.4 → 98.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

How the Price Gap Changed

Kankakee and Walla Walla share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 3.9 to 2.1 RPP points. Walla Walla remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 35.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (30.8 to 4.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Kankakee RPP Walla Walla RPP Relative Gap
2008 99.5 95.6 3.9 points Kankakee higher
2012 99.2 95.1 4.0 points Kankakee higher
2016 97.6 96.3 1.3 points Kankakee higher
2020 90.6 95.2 4.6 points Walla Walla higher
2024 96.4 98.5 2.1 points Walla Walla higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Walla Walla more expensive than Kankakee?

Walla Walla is 2.2% more expensive than Kankakee. The overall cost index is 98.5 vs 96.4 (national average = 100).

What salary in Walla Walla equals $100K in Kankakee?

A $100,000 salary in Kankakee has the same purchasing power as $102,204 in Walla Walla. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Kankakee and Walla Walla?

Rents in Kankakee are indexed at 92.9 while Walla Walla is at 86.6 (national average = 100). Kankakee has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.