Kankakee vs Lancaster

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lancaster is 1.9% more expensive than Kankakee.

1.9% more expensive

Lancaster, PA is 1.9% more expensive than Kankakee, IL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 96.4). A $100,000 salary in Kankakee buys about the same as $101,933 in Lancaster; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 96.4 (Kankakee) vs 98.3 (Lancaster)
  • $100k in Kankakee ≈ $101,933 purchasing power in Lancaster
  • Services drives the gap (+17.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair IL:PA 96.4→98.3

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE IL × PA
  • SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Kankakee
96.4
Cost Index
Lancaster
98.3
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Kankakee, IL and Lancaster, PA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.9 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services leads the difference, with Lancaster 17.8 points higher than Kankakee. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Kankakee to $101,933 in Lancaster, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Kankakee
96.4
Lancaster
98.3
Goods
Kankakee
93.6
Lancaster
100.7
Services
Kankakee
89.4
Lancaster
107.3
Rents
Kankakee
92.9
Lancaster
93.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

How the Price Gap Changed

Kankakee and Lancaster share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 0.7 to 1.9 RPP points. Lancaster remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 10.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (3.7 to 7.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Kankakee RPP Lancaster RPP Relative Gap
2008 99.5 100.2 0.7 points Lancaster higher
2012 99.2 97.8 1.4 points Kankakee higher
2016 97.6 99.4 1.7 points Lancaster higher
2020 90.6 97.9 7.3 points Lancaster higher
2024 96.4 98.3 1.9 points Lancaster higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Kankakee would need to be in Lancaster for the same purchasing power:

In Kankakee In Lancaster Difference
$50,000 $50,966 +$966
$75,000 $76,450 +$1,450
$100,000 $101,933 +$1,933
$150,000 $152,899 +$2,899
$ in Kankakee = in Lancaster

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.4 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Lancaster more expensive than Kankakee?

Lancaster is 1.9% more expensive than Kankakee. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 96.4 (national average = 100).

What salary in Lancaster equals $100K in Kankakee?

A $100,000 salary in Kankakee has the same purchasing power as $101,933 in Lancaster. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Kankakee and Lancaster?

Rents in Kankakee are indexed at 92.9 while Lancaster is at 93.8 (national average = 100). Lancaster has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.