Joplin vs Florence-Muscle Shoals

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Florence-Muscle Shoals is 1.1% less expensive than Joplin.

1.1% less expensive

Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL is 1.1% less expensive than Joplin, MO-KS on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 84.8 vs 85.7). A $100,000 salary in Joplin buys about the same as $98,949 in Florence-Muscle Shoals; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 85.7 (Joplin) vs 84.8 (Florence-Muscle Shoals)
  • $100k in Joplin ≈ $98,949 purchasing power in Florence-Muscle Shoals
  • Rents drives the gap (-6.3 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair MO:AL 85.7→84.8

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE MO × AL
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Joplin
85.7
Cost Index
Florence-Muscle Shoals
84.8
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Joplin, MO-KS and Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.9 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Florence-Muscle Shoals is 6.3 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Joplin corresponds to $98,949 in Florence-Muscle Shoals.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Joplin
85.7
Florence-Muscle Shoals
84.8
Goods
Joplin
94.2
Florence-Muscle Shoals
96.4
Services
Joplin
85.9
Florence-Muscle Shoals
85.8
Rents
Joplin
54.0
Florence-Muscle Shoals
47.7

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Joplin would need to be in Florence-Muscle Shoals for the same purchasing power:

In Joplin In Florence-Muscle Shoals Difference
$50,000 $49,474 $-526
$75,000 $74,212 $-788
$100,000 $98,949 $-1,051
$150,000 $148,423 $-1,577
$ in Joplin = in Florence-Muscle Shoals

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (85.7 → 84.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Florence-Muscle Shoals more expensive than Joplin?

Florence-Muscle Shoals is 1.1% less expensive than Joplin. The overall cost index is 84.8 vs 85.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in Florence-Muscle Shoals equals $100K in Joplin?

A $100,000 salary in Joplin has the same purchasing power as $98,949 in Florence-Muscle Shoals. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Joplin and Florence-Muscle Shoals?

Rents in Joplin are indexed at 54.0 while Florence-Muscle Shoals is at 47.7 (national average = 100). Joplin has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.