Overall
- Janesville-Beloit
- 93.7
- Harrisburg-Carlisle
- 98.7
Diff +4.9 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Harrisburg-Carlisle is 5.3% more expensive than Janesville-Beloit.
Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA is 5.3% more expensive than Janesville-Beloit, WI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.7 vs 93.7). A $100,000 salary in Janesville-Beloit buys about the same as $105,279 in Harrisburg-Carlisle; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair WI:PA 93.7→98.7
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA is 5.3% more expensive than Janesville-Beloit, WI, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 4.9-point overall gap.
Services leads the difference, with Harrisburg-Carlisle 17.7 points higher than Janesville-Beloit. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Janesville-Beloit to $105,279 in Harrisburg-Carlisle, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Janesville-Beloit and Harrisburg-Carlisle share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 4.5 to 4.9 RPP points. Harrisburg-Carlisle remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 8.2 points between the first and latest shared releases (9.6 to 17.7 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Janesville-Beloit RPP | Harrisburg-Carlisle RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 94.5 | 99.0 | 4.5 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2012 | 95.0 | 97.0 | 2.0 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2016 | 92.8 | 98.2 | 5.4 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2020 | 91.6 | 96.1 | 4.6 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2024 | 93.7 | 98.7 | 4.9 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff +4.9 RPP
Diff +6.9 RPP
Diff +17.7 RPP
Diff +16.7 RPP
| Category | Janesville-Beloit | Harrisburg-Carlisle | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 93.7 | 98.7 | +4.9 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 100.7 | +6.9 |
| Services | 90.4 | 108.1 | +17.7 |
| Rents | 79.6 | 96.3 | +16.7 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Janesville-Beloit would need to be in Harrisburg-Carlisle for the same purchasing power:
| In Janesville-Beloit | In Harrisburg-Carlisle | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $52,640 | +$2,640 |
| $75,000 | $78,960 | +$3,960 |
| $100,000 | $105,279 | +$5,279 |
| $150,000 | $157,919 | +$7,919 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (93.7 → 98.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Harrisburg-Carlisle is 5.3% more expensive than Janesville-Beloit. The overall cost index is 98.7 vs 93.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Janesville-Beloit has the same purchasing power as $105,279 in Harrisburg-Carlisle. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Janesville-Beloit are indexed at 79.6 while Harrisburg-Carlisle is at 96.3 (national average = 100). Harrisburg-Carlisle has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.