Overall
- Jacksonville
- 92.1
- Appleton
- 92.4
Diff +0.3 RPP
Jacksonville vs Appleton
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Appleton is 0.4% more expensive than Jacksonville.
0.4% more expensive
Appleton, WI is 0.4% more expensive than Jacksonville, NC on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.4 vs 92.1). A $100,000 salary in Jacksonville buys about the same as $100,363 in Appleton; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 92.1 (Jacksonville) vs 92.4 (Appleton)
- $100k in Jacksonville ≈ $100,363 purchasing power in Appleton
- Services drives the gap (+3.3 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair NC:WI 92.1→92.4
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE NC × WI
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Jacksonville
92.1
Cost Index
Appleton
92.4
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Jacksonville, NC and Appleton, WI are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Appleton is 3.3 points higher. But goods and rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Jacksonville to $100,363 in Appleton, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Jacksonville
- 96.6
- Appleton
- 93.8
Diff -2.8 RPP
Services
- Jacksonville
- 87.2
- Appleton
- 90.6
Diff +3.3 RPP
Rents
- Jacksonville
- 72.1
- Appleton
- 70.8
Diff -1.3 RPP
| Category | Jacksonville | Appleton | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.1 | 92.4 | +0.3 |
| Goods | 96.6 | 93.8 | -2.8 |
| Services | 87.2 | 90.6 | +3.3 |
| Rents | 72.1 | 70.8 | -1.3 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Jacksonville 92.1
Appleton 92.4
Goods
Jacksonville 96.6
Appleton 93.8
Services
Jacksonville 87.2
Appleton 90.6
Rents
Jacksonville 72.1
Appleton 70.8
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Jacksonville would need to be in Appleton for the same purchasing power:
| In Jacksonville | In Appleton | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,181 | +$181 |
| $75,000 | $75,272 | +$272 |
| $100,000 | $100,363 | +$363 |
| $150,000 | $150,544 | +$544 |
$ in Jacksonville = in Appleton
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.1 → 92.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Appleton more expensive than Jacksonville?
Appleton is 0.4% more expensive than Jacksonville. The overall cost index is 92.4 vs 92.1 (national average = 100).
What salary in Appleton equals $100K in Jacksonville?
A $100,000 salary in Jacksonville has the same purchasing power as $100,363 in Appleton. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Jacksonville and Appleton?
Rents in Jacksonville are indexed at 72.1 while Appleton is at 70.8 (national average = 100). Jacksonville has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.