Overall
Diff -1.9 RPP
Jackson vs Monroe
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Monroe is 2.3% less expensive than Jackson.
2.3% less expensive
Monroe, LA is 2.3% less expensive than Jackson, TN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 83.6 vs 85.5). A $100,000 salary in Jackson buys about the same as $97,749 in Monroe; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 85.5 (Jackson) vs 83.6 (Monroe)
- $100k in Jackson ≈ $97,749 purchasing power in Monroe
- Rents drives the gap (-13.8 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair TN:LA 85.5→83.6
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE TN × LA
- RENT-LED Rent-led gap
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Jackson
85.5
Cost Index
Monroe
83.6
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Jackson, TN and Monroe, LA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.9 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents leads the difference, with Monroe 13.8 points lower than Jackson. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Jackson corresponds to $97,749 in Monroe.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff -2.6 RPP
Services
Diff -0.4 RPP
Rents
Diff -13.8 RPP
| Category | Jackson | Monroe | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 85.5 | 83.6 | -1.9 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 93.7 | -2.6 |
| Services | 72.6 | 72.2 | -0.4 |
| Rents | 56.6 | 42.8 | -13.8 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Jackson 85.5
Monroe 83.6
Goods
Jackson 96.2
Monroe 93.7
Services
Jackson 72.6
Monroe 72.2
Rents
Jackson 56.6
Monroe 42.8
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Jackson would need to be in Monroe for the same purchasing power:
| In Jackson | In Monroe | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $48,875 | $-1,125 |
| $75,000 | $73,312 | $-1,688 |
| $100,000 | $97,749 | $-2,251 |
| $150,000 | $146,624 | $-3,376 |
$ in Jackson = in Monroe
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (85.5 → 83.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Monroe more expensive than Jackson?
Monroe is 2.3% less expensive than Jackson. The overall cost index is 83.6 vs 85.5 (national average = 100).
What salary in Monroe equals $100K in Jackson?
A $100,000 salary in Jackson has the same purchasing power as $97,749 in Monroe. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Jackson and Monroe?
Rents in Jackson are indexed at 56.6 while Monroe is at 42.8 (national average = 100). Jackson has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.