Overall
Diff -0.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Duluth is 0.3% less expensive than Jackson.
Duluth, MN-WI is 0.3% less expensive than Jackson, MS on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 88.8 vs 89.0). A $100,000 salary in Jackson buys about the same as $99,686 in Duluth; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair MS:MN 89.0→88.8
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Jackson, MS and Duluth, MN-WI are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Duluth is 9.1 points higher. But services and rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Jackson to $99,686 in Duluth, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.3 RPP
Diff -0.9 RPP
Diff +9.1 RPP
Diff +6.4 RPP
| Category | Jackson | Duluth | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 89.0 | 88.8 | -0.3 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 95.3 | -0.9 |
| Services | 78.1 | 87.3 | +9.1 |
| Rents | 64.8 | 71.1 | +6.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Jackson and Duluth share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 2.4 to 0.3 RPP points. Jackson remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 14.4 points between the first and latest shared releases (8.0 to 6.4 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Jackson RPP | Duluth RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 91.6 | 89.2 | 2.4 points Jackson higher |
| 2012 | 93.0 | 90.8 | 2.2 points Jackson higher |
| 2016 | 93.5 | 88.3 | 5.3 points Jackson higher |
| 2020 | 88.9 | 83.1 | 5.8 points Jackson higher |
| 2024 | 89.0 | 88.8 | 0.3 points Jackson higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Jackson would need to be in Duluth for the same purchasing power:
| In Jackson | In Duluth | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,843 | $-157 |
| $75,000 | $74,764 | $-236 |
| $100,000 | $99,686 | $-314 |
| $150,000 | $149,528 | $-472 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (89.0 → 88.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Duluth is 0.3% less expensive than Jackson. The overall cost index is 88.8 vs 89.0 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Jackson has the same purchasing power as $99,686 in Duluth. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Jackson are indexed at 64.8 while Duluth is at 71.1 (national average = 100). Duluth has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.