Jackson vs Altoona

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Altoona is 0.5% more expensive than Jackson.

0.5% more expensive

Altoona, PA is 0.5% more expensive than Jackson, MS on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 89.5 vs 89.0). A $100,000 salary in Jackson buys about the same as $100,515 in Altoona; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 89.0 (Jackson) vs 89.5 (Altoona)
  • $100k in Jackson ≈ $100,515 purchasing power in Altoona
  • Services drives the gap (+29.5 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair MS:PA 89.0→89.5

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE MS × PA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Jackson
89.0
Cost Index
Altoona
89.5
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Jackson, MS and Altoona, PA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Altoona is 29.5 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Jackson to $100,515 in Altoona, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Jackson
89.0
Altoona
89.5
Goods
Jackson
96.2
Altoona
100.7
Services
Jackson
78.1
Altoona
107.7
Rents
Jackson
64.8
Altoona
55.0

Vertical line = national average (100)

How the Price Gap Changed

Jackson and Altoona share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 2.3 to 0.5 RPP points. Altoona remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 3.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (25.7 to 29.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Jackson RPP Altoona RPP Relative Gap
2008 91.6 93.9 2.3 points Altoona higher
2012 93.0 92.3 0.7 points Jackson higher
2016 93.5 91.5 2.0 points Jackson higher
2020 88.9 89.7 0.9 points Altoona higher
2024 89.0 89.5 0.5 points Altoona higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Jackson would need to be in Altoona for the same purchasing power:

In Jackson In Altoona Difference
$50,000 $50,258 +$258
$75,000 $75,387 +$387
$100,000 $100,515 +$515
$150,000 $150,773 +$773
$ in Jackson = in Altoona

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (89.0 → 89.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Altoona more expensive than Jackson?

Altoona is 0.5% more expensive than Jackson. The overall cost index is 89.5 vs 89.0 (national average = 100).

What salary in Altoona equals $100K in Jackson?

A $100,000 salary in Jackson has the same purchasing power as $100,515 in Altoona. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Jackson and Altoona?

Rents in Jackson are indexed at 64.8 while Altoona is at 55.0 (national average = 100). Jackson has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.