Overall
- Ithaca
- 103.3
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 103.7
Diff +0.4 RPP
Ithaca vs Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 0.3% more expensive than Ithaca.
0.3% more expensive
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 0.3% more expensive than Ithaca, NY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.7 vs 103.3). A $100,000 salary in Ithaca buys about the same as $100,342 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 103.3 (Ithaca) vs 103.7 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater)
- $100k in Ithaca ≈ $100,342 purchasing power in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- Services drives the gap (-39.9 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair NY:WA 103.3→103.7
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE NY × WA
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Ithaca
103.3
Cost Index
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Ithaca, NY and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 39.9 points lower. But services and rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Ithaca to $100,342 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Ithaca
- 99.7
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 105.0
Diff +5.3 RPP
Services
- Ithaca
- 131.6
Diff -39.9 RPP
Rents
- Ithaca
- 128.4
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 116.7
Diff -11.7 RPP
| Category | Ithaca | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.3 | 103.7 | +0.4 |
| Goods | 99.7 | 105.0 | +5.3 |
| Services | 131.6 | 91.7 | -39.9 |
| Rents | 128.4 | 116.7 | -11.7 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Ithaca 103.3
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 103.7
Goods
Ithaca 99.7
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 105.0
Services
Ithaca 131.6
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 91.7
Rents
Ithaca 128.4
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 116.7
Vertical line = national average (100)
How the Price Gap Changed
Ithaca and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 5.2 to 0.4 RPP points. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 32.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (20.3 to 11.7 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Ithaca RPP | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 100.2 | 105.4 | 5.2 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2012 | 101.9 | 101.3 | 0.6 points Ithaca higher |
| 2016 | 102.0 | 106.0 | 4.0 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2020 | 101.3 | 101.9 | 0.6 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2024 | 103.3 | 103.7 | 0.4 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Ithaca would need to be in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater for the same purchasing power:
| In Ithaca | In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,171 | +$171 |
| $75,000 | $75,256 | +$256 |
| $100,000 | $100,342 | +$342 |
| $150,000 | $150,513 | +$513 |
$ in Ithaca = in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.3 → 103.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater more expensive than Ithaca?
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 0.3% more expensive than Ithaca. The overall cost index is 103.7 vs 103.3 (national average = 100).
What salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater equals $100K in Ithaca?
A $100,000 salary in Ithaca has the same purchasing power as $100,342 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Ithaca and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?
Rents in Ithaca are indexed at 128.4 while Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is at 116.7 (national average = 100). Ithaca has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.