Overall
Diff +0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lincoln is 0.1% more expensive than Iowa City.
Lincoln, NE is 0.1% more expensive than Iowa City, IA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.6 vs 91.5). A $100,000 salary in Iowa City buys about the same as $100,079 in Lincoln; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair IA:NE 91.5→91.6
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Iowa City, IA and Lincoln, NE are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Lincoln is 6.9 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Iowa City to $100,079 in Lincoln, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.1 RPP
Diff +0.4 RPP
Diff -6.9 RPP
Diff +0.2 RPP
| Category | Iowa City | Lincoln | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.5 | 91.6 | +0.1 |
| Goods | 93.7 | 94.1 | +0.4 |
| Services | 83.7 | 76.8 | -6.9 |
| Rents | 84.0 | 84.2 | +0.2 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Iowa City and Lincoln share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 0.8 to 0.1 RPP points. Lincoln remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 8.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (8.5 to 0.2 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Iowa City RPP | Lincoln RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 95.7 | 95.0 | 0.8 points Iowa City higher |
| 2012 | 96.5 | 93.8 | 2.6 points Iowa City higher |
| 2016 | 95.4 | 93.3 | 2.2 points Iowa City higher |
| 2020 | 95.6 | 95.2 | 0.3 points Iowa City higher |
| 2024 | 91.5 | 91.6 | 0.1 points Lincoln higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Iowa City would need to be in Lincoln for the same purchasing power:
| In Iowa City | In Lincoln | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,039 | +$39 |
| $75,000 | $75,059 | +$59 |
| $100,000 | $100,079 | +$79 |
| $150,000 | $150,118 | +$118 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.5 → 91.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Lincoln is 0.1% more expensive than Iowa City. The overall cost index is 91.6 vs 91.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Iowa City has the same purchasing power as $100,079 in Lincoln. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Iowa City are indexed at 84.0 while Lincoln is at 84.2 (national average = 100). Lincoln has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.