Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux vs Chicago-Naperville-Elgin

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is 21.7% more expensive than Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

The Bureau of Economic Analysis indexes Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA at an overall Regional Price Parity of 85.1 and Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN at 103.6, using the U.S. national average of 100 as the reference point. That puts Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 21.7% more expensive than Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux on a blended basket of goods, services, and rents. The raw index gap of 18.5 points matters more than the headline comparison because it flows directly into salary-equivalent math that families use for relocation, job offers, and remote-work arbitrage decisions.

Inside the breakdown, Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux indexes goods at 93.7, services at 71.3, and rents at 51.3, while Chicago-Naperville-Elgin comes in at 107.3, 83.6, and 112.0 on the same three categories. The rent line carries the largest weight in the BEA methodology, so a metro with a higher rent index almost always ends up more expensive overall - Chicago-Naperville-Elgin carries the heavier rent load here, and that tends to dominate household budget experience on the ground.

In salary terms, a $100,000 income in Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux has the same purchasing power as $121,729 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin based on these indexes. The two metros serve populations of roughly 204,032 (Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux) and 9,359,555 (Chicago-Naperville-Elgin), and median household incomes are $64,269 versus $88,850 respectively - so the right way to read this comparison is never the index alone, but the ratio of your expected local salary to the rent and services mix. For any serious relocation or remote-work decision, pair this BEA comparison with BLS occupation-specific wage data, HUD Fair Market Rent tables, and state tax treatment before committing.

Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux
85.1
Cost Index
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Cost Index

Category Breakdown

Category Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux Chicago-Naperville-Elgin Difference
Overall 85.1 103.6 +18.5
Goods 93.7 107.3 +13.6
Services 71.3 83.6 +12.3
Rents 51.3 112.0 +60.7

Visual Comparison

Overall
Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux
85.1
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Goods
Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux
93.7
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
107.3
Services
Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux
71.3
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
83.6
Rents
Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux
51.3
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
112.0

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux would need to be in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin for the same purchasing power:

In Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin Difference
$50,000 $60,864 +$10,864
$75,000 $91,297 +$16,297
$100,000 $121,729 +$21,729
$150,000 $182,593 +$32,593

Use the salary calculator for custom amounts.

Metro Context

Metric Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
Population 204,032 9,359,555
Median Income $64,269 $88,850
Data Year 2024 2024

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Chicago-Naperville-Elgin more expensive than Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux?
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is 21.7% more expensive than Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux. The overall cost index is 103.6 vs 85.1 (national average = 100).
What salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin equals $100K in Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux?
A $100,000 salary in Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux has the same purchasing power as $121,729 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux and Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?
Rents in Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux are indexed at 51.3 while Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is at 112.0 (national average = 100). Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has higher rents.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities (2024). Index where national average = 100.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost Editorial