Overall
- Hot Springs
- 85.7
- Anniston-Oxford
- 85.9
Diff +0.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Anniston-Oxford is 0.3% more expensive than Hot Springs.
Anniston-Oxford, AL is 0.3% more expensive than Hot Springs, AR on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 85.9 vs 85.7). A $100,000 salary in Hot Springs buys about the same as $100,255 in Anniston-Oxford; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair AR:AL 85.7→85.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Hot Springs, AR and Anniston-Oxford, AL are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Anniston-Oxford is 12.9 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Hot Springs to $100,255 in Anniston-Oxford, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff +2.8 RPP
Diff +12.9 RPP
Diff -2.6 RPP
| Category | Hot Springs | Anniston-Oxford | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 85.7 | 85.9 | +0.2 |
| Goods | 93.6 | 96.4 | +2.8 |
| Services | 74.3 | 87.1 | +12.9 |
| Rents | 57.3 | 54.7 | -2.6 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Hot Springs and Anniston-Oxford share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 1.6 to 0.2 RPP points. Anniston-Oxford remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 5.6 points between the first and latest shared releases (18.5 to 12.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Hot Springs RPP | Anniston-Oxford RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 86.7 | 88.2 | 1.6 points Anniston-Oxford higher |
| 2012 | 88.2 | 90.8 | 2.6 points Anniston-Oxford higher |
| 2016 | 88.4 | 90.8 | 2.4 points Anniston-Oxford higher |
| 2020 | 87.2 | 85.8 | 1.4 points Hot Springs higher |
| 2024 | 85.7 | 85.9 | 0.2 points Anniston-Oxford higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Hot Springs would need to be in Anniston-Oxford for the same purchasing power:
| In Hot Springs | In Anniston-Oxford | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,128 | +$128 |
| $75,000 | $75,192 | +$192 |
| $100,000 | $100,255 | +$255 |
| $150,000 | $150,383 | +$383 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (85.7 → 85.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Anniston-Oxford is 0.3% more expensive than Hot Springs. The overall cost index is 85.9 vs 85.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Hot Springs has the same purchasing power as $100,255 in Anniston-Oxford. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Hot Springs are indexed at 57.3 while Anniston-Oxford is at 54.7 (national average = 100). Hot Springs has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.