Hattiesburg vs Brunswick-St. Simons

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Brunswick-St. Simons is 0.1% more expensive than Hattiesburg.

0.1% more expensive

Brunswick-St. Simons, GA is 0.1% more expensive than Hattiesburg, MS on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 87.7 vs 87.6). A $100,000 salary in Hattiesburg buys about the same as $100,086 in Brunswick-St. Simons; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 87.6 (Hattiesburg) vs 87.7 (Brunswick-St. Simons)
  • $100k in Hattiesburg ≈ $100,086 purchasing power in Brunswick-St. Simons
  • Services drives the gap (+10.4 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair MS:GA 87.6→87.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE MS × GA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Hattiesburg
87.6
Cost Index
Brunswick-St. Simons
87.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Hattiesburg, MS and Brunswick-St. Simons, GA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Brunswick-St. Simons is 10.4 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Hattiesburg to $100,086 in Brunswick-St. Simons, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Hattiesburg
87.6
Brunswick-St. Simons
87.7
Goods
Hattiesburg
96.2
Brunswick-St. Simons
96.3
Services
Hattiesburg
76.9
Brunswick-St. Simons
87.3
Rents
Hattiesburg
60.1
Brunswick-St. Simons
56.3

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Hattiesburg would need to be in Brunswick-St. Simons for the same purchasing power:

In Hattiesburg In Brunswick-St. Simons Difference
$50,000 $50,043 +$43
$75,000 $75,064 +$64
$100,000 $100,086 +$86
$150,000 $150,128 +$128
$ in Hattiesburg = in Brunswick-St. Simons

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (87.6 → 87.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Brunswick-St. Simons more expensive than Hattiesburg?

Brunswick-St. Simons is 0.1% more expensive than Hattiesburg. The overall cost index is 87.7 vs 87.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Brunswick-St. Simons equals $100K in Hattiesburg?

A $100,000 salary in Hattiesburg has the same purchasing power as $100,086 in Brunswick-St. Simons. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Hattiesburg and Brunswick-St. Simons?

Rents in Hattiesburg are indexed at 60.1 while Brunswick-St. Simons is at 56.3 (national average = 100). Hattiesburg has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.