Overall
- Harrisonburg
- 94.9
- Pittsfield
- 95.1
Diff +0.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Pittsfield is 0.2% more expensive than Harrisonburg.
Pittsfield, MA is 0.2% more expensive than Harrisonburg, VA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.1 vs 94.9). A $100,000 salary in Harrisonburg buys about the same as $100,226 in Pittsfield; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair VA:MA 94.9→95.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Harrisonburg, VA and Pittsfield, MA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Pittsfield is 65.2 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Harrisonburg to $100,226 in Pittsfield, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff +65.2 RPP
Diff -8.8 RPP
| Category | Harrisonburg | Pittsfield | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 94.9 | 95.1 | +0.2 |
| Goods | 96.8 | 97.0 | +0.2 |
| Services | 88.5 | 153.7 | +65.2 |
| Rents | 82.3 | 73.5 | -8.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Harrisonburg would need to be in Pittsfield for the same purchasing power:
| In Harrisonburg | In Pittsfield | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,113 | +$113 |
| $75,000 | $75,169 | +$169 |
| $100,000 | $100,226 | +$226 |
| $150,000 | $150,338 | +$338 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (94.9 → 95.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Pittsfield is 0.2% more expensive than Harrisonburg. The overall cost index is 95.1 vs 94.9 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Harrisonburg has the same purchasing power as $100,226 in Pittsfield. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Harrisonburg are indexed at 82.3 while Pittsfield is at 73.5 (national average = 100). Harrisonburg has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.