Overall
- Harrisburg-Carlisle
- 98.7
- Logan
- 95.9
Diff -2.7 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Logan is 2.8% less expensive than Harrisburg-Carlisle.
Logan, UT-ID is 2.8% less expensive than Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.9 vs 98.7). A $100,000 salary in Harrisburg-Carlisle buys about the same as $97,240 in Logan; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair PA:UT 98.7→95.9
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Logan, UT-ID is 2.8% less expensive than Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.7-point overall gap.
Services leads the difference, with Logan 30.2 points lower than Harrisburg-Carlisle. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Harrisburg-Carlisle to $97,240 in Logan, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Harrisburg-Carlisle and Logan share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 3.2 to 2.7 RPP points. Harrisburg-Carlisle remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 15.1 points between the first and latest shared releases (45.3 to 30.2 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Harrisburg-Carlisle RPP | Logan RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 99.0 | 95.8 | 3.2 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2012 | 97.0 | 92.5 | 4.5 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2016 | 98.2 | 94.7 | 3.5 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2020 | 96.1 | 91.3 | 4.8 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2024 | 98.7 | 95.9 | 2.7 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff -2.7 RPP
Diff -4.3 RPP
Diff -30.2 RPP
Diff -5.3 RPP
| Category | Harrisburg-Carlisle | Logan | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.7 | 95.9 | -2.7 |
| Goods | 100.7 | 96.4 | -4.3 |
| Services | 108.1 | 77.9 | -30.2 |
| Rents | 96.3 | 91.0 | -5.3 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Harrisburg-Carlisle would need to be in Logan for the same purchasing power:
| In Harrisburg-Carlisle | In Logan | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $48,620 | $-1,380 |
| $75,000 | $72,930 | $-2,070 |
| $100,000 | $97,240 | $-2,760 |
| $150,000 | $145,860 | $-4,140 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.7 → 95.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Logan is 2.8% less expensive than Harrisburg-Carlisle. The overall cost index is 95.9 vs 98.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Harrisburg-Carlisle has the same purchasing power as $97,240 in Logan. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Harrisburg-Carlisle are indexed at 96.3 while Logan is at 91.0 (national average = 100). Harrisburg-Carlisle has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.