Overall
- Harrisburg-Carlisle
- 98.7
- Lewiston-Auburn
- 94.7
Diff -3.9 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lewiston-Auburn is 4% less expensive than Harrisburg-Carlisle.
Lewiston-Auburn, ME is 4% less expensive than Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 94.7 vs 98.7). A $100,000 salary in Harrisburg-Carlisle buys about the same as $96,032 in Lewiston-Auburn; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair PA:ME 98.7→94.7
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -3.9 RPP
Diff -3.5 RPP
Diff +26.3 RPP
Diff -27.3 RPP
| Category | Harrisburg-Carlisle | Lewiston-Auburn | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.7 | 94.7 | -3.9 |
| Goods | 100.7 | 97.2 | -3.5 |
| Services | 108.1 | 134.4 | +26.3 |
| Rents | 96.3 | 69.0 | -27.3 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Lewiston-Auburn is 27.3 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Lewiston-Auburn, ME is 4% less expensive than Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 3.9-point overall gap.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Harrisburg-Carlisle corresponds to $96,032 in Lewiston-Auburn.
What a salary in Harrisburg-Carlisle would need to be in Lewiston-Auburn for the same purchasing power:
| In Harrisburg-Carlisle | In Lewiston-Auburn | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $48,016 | $-1,984 |
| $75,000 | $72,024 | $-2,976 |
| $100,000 | $96,032 | $-3,968 |
| $150,000 | $144,049 | $-5,951 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.7 → 94.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Harrisburg-Carlisle and Lewiston-Auburn share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 1.2 to 3.9 RPP points. Harrisburg-Carlisle remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 21.1 points between the first and latest shared releases (6.1 to 27.3 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Harrisburg-Carlisle RPP | Lewiston-Auburn RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 99.0 | 97.7 | 1.2 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2012 | 97.0 | 98.8 | 1.8 points Lewiston-Auburn higher |
| 2016 | 98.2 | 96.6 | 1.6 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2020 | 96.1 | 99.7 | 3.5 points Lewiston-Auburn higher |
| 2024 | 98.7 | 94.7 | 3.9 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Lewiston-Auburn is 4% less expensive than Harrisburg-Carlisle. The overall cost index is 94.7 vs 98.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Harrisburg-Carlisle has the same purchasing power as $96,032 in Lewiston-Auburn. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Harrisburg-Carlisle are indexed at 96.3 while Lewiston-Auburn is at 69.0 (national average = 100). Harrisburg-Carlisle has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.