Overall
- Harrisburg-Carlisle
- 98.7
- Casper
- 93.8
Diff -4.8 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Casper is 4.9% less expensive than Harrisburg-Carlisle.
Casper, WY is 4.9% less expensive than Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 93.8 vs 98.7). A $100,000 salary in Harrisburg-Carlisle buys about the same as $95,113 in Casper; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair PA:WY 98.7→93.8
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Casper, WY is 4.9% less expensive than Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 4.8-point overall gap.
Services leads the difference, with Casper 29.2 points lower than Harrisburg-Carlisle. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Harrisburg-Carlisle to $95,113 in Casper, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Harrisburg-Carlisle and Casper share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 6.6 to 4.8 RPP points. Harrisburg-Carlisle remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 7.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (37.0 to 29.2 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Harrisburg-Carlisle RPP | Casper RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 99.0 | 92.3 | 6.6 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2012 | 97.0 | 99.2 | 2.2 points Casper higher |
| 2016 | 98.2 | 97.6 | 0.6 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2020 | 96.1 | 93.3 | 2.8 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2024 | 98.7 | 93.8 | 4.8 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff -4.8 RPP
Diff -5.3 RPP
Diff -29.2 RPP
Diff -22.1 RPP
| Category | Harrisburg-Carlisle | Casper | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.7 | 93.8 | -4.8 |
| Goods | 100.7 | 95.4 | -5.3 |
| Services | 108.1 | 78.9 | -29.2 |
| Rents | 96.3 | 74.2 | -22.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Harrisburg-Carlisle would need to be in Casper for the same purchasing power:
| In Harrisburg-Carlisle | In Casper | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $47,557 | $-2,443 |
| $75,000 | $71,335 | $-3,665 |
| $100,000 | $95,113 | $-4,887 |
| $150,000 | $142,670 | $-7,330 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.7 → 93.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Casper is 4.9% less expensive than Harrisburg-Carlisle. The overall cost index is 93.8 vs 98.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Harrisburg-Carlisle has the same purchasing power as $95,113 in Casper. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Harrisburg-Carlisle are indexed at 96.3 while Casper is at 74.2 (national average = 100). Harrisburg-Carlisle has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.