Overall
- Hanford-Corcoran
- 101.6
- Lancaster
- 98.3
Diff -3.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lancaster is 3.3% less expensive than Hanford-Corcoran.
Lancaster, PA is 3.3% less expensive than Hanford-Corcoran, CA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 101.6). A $100,000 salary in Hanford-Corcoran buys about the same as $96,698 in Lancaster; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair CA:PA 101.6→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -3.4 RPP
Diff -4.5 RPP
Diff -50.1 RPP
Diff +0.3 RPP
| Category | Hanford-Corcoran | Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 101.6 | 98.3 | -3.4 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 100.7 | -4.5 |
| Services | 157.4 | 107.3 | -50.1 |
| Rents | 93.5 | 93.8 | +0.3 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Services creates the largest separation: Lancaster is 50.1 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Lancaster, PA is 3.3% less expensive than Hanford-Corcoran, CA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 3.4-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Hanford-Corcoran is above 100 while Lancaster is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Hanford-Corcoran to $96,698 in Lancaster, but it is not a personal spending weight.
What a salary in Hanford-Corcoran would need to be in Lancaster for the same purchasing power:
| In Hanford-Corcoran | In Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $48,349 | $-1,651 |
| $75,000 | $72,524 | $-2,476 |
| $100,000 | $96,698 | $-3,302 |
| $150,000 | $145,047 | $-4,953 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (101.6 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Lancaster is 3.3% less expensive than Hanford-Corcoran. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 101.6 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Hanford-Corcoran has the same purchasing power as $96,698 in Lancaster. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Hanford-Corcoran are indexed at 93.5 while Lancaster is at 93.8 (national average = 100). Lancaster has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.