Hagerstown-Martinsburg vs New York-Newark-Jersey City

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. New York-Newark-Jersey City is 19.5% more expensive than Hagerstown-Martinsburg.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

The Bureau of Economic Analysis indexes Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV at an overall Regional Price Parity of 94.2 and New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ at 112.6, using the U.S. national average of 100 as the reference point. That puts New York-Newark-Jersey City 19.5% more expensive than Hagerstown-Martinsburg on a blended basket of goods, services, and rents. The raw index gap of 18.4 points matters more than the headline comparison because it flows directly into salary-equivalent math that families use for relocation, job offers, and remote-work arbitrage decisions.

Inside the breakdown, Hagerstown-Martinsburg indexes goods at 96.4, services at 95.7, and rents at 75.7, while New York-Newark-Jersey City comes in at 110.3, 127.0, and 148.6 on the same three categories. The rent line carries the largest weight in the BEA methodology, so a metro with a higher rent index almost always ends up more expensive overall - New York-Newark-Jersey City carries the heavier rent load here, and that tends to dominate household budget experience on the ground.

In salary terms, a $100,000 income in Hagerstown-Martinsburg has the same purchasing power as $119,530 in New York-Newark-Jersey City based on these indexes. The two metros serve populations of roughly 298,525 (Hagerstown-Martinsburg) and 19,756,722 (New York-Newark-Jersey City), and median household incomes are $75,473 versus $97,334 respectively - so the right way to read this comparison is never the index alone, but the ratio of your expected local salary to the rent and services mix. For any serious relocation or remote-work decision, pair this BEA comparison with BLS occupation-specific wage data, HUD Fair Market Rent tables, and state tax treatment before committing.

Hagerstown-Martinsburg
94.2
Cost Index
New York-Newark-Jersey City
112.6
Cost Index

Category Breakdown

Category Hagerstown-Martinsburg New York-Newark-Jersey City Difference
Overall 94.2 112.6 +18.4
Goods 96.4 110.3 +13.9
Services 95.7 127.0 +31.3
Rents 75.7 148.6 +72.9

Visual Comparison

Overall
Hagerstown-Martinsburg
94.2
New York-Newark-Jersey City
112.6
Goods
Hagerstown-Martinsburg
96.4
New York-Newark-Jersey City
110.3
Services
Hagerstown-Martinsburg
95.7
New York-Newark-Jersey City
127.0
Rents
Hagerstown-Martinsburg
75.7
New York-Newark-Jersey City
148.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Hagerstown-Martinsburg would need to be in New York-Newark-Jersey City for the same purchasing power:

In Hagerstown-Martinsburg In New York-Newark-Jersey City Difference
$50,000 $59,765 +$9,765
$75,000 $89,648 +$14,648
$100,000 $119,530 +$19,530
$150,000 $179,296 +$29,296

Use the salary calculator for custom amounts.

Metro Context

Metric Hagerstown-Martinsburg New York-Newark-Jersey City
Population 298,525 19,756,722
Median Income $75,473 $97,334
Data Year 2024 2024

Frequently Asked Questions

Is New York-Newark-Jersey City more expensive than Hagerstown-Martinsburg?
New York-Newark-Jersey City is 19.5% more expensive than Hagerstown-Martinsburg. The overall cost index is 112.6 vs 94.2 (national average = 100).
What salary in New York-Newark-Jersey City equals $100K in Hagerstown-Martinsburg?
A $100,000 salary in Hagerstown-Martinsburg has the same purchasing power as $119,530 in New York-Newark-Jersey City. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Hagerstown-Martinsburg and New York-Newark-Jersey City?
Rents in Hagerstown-Martinsburg are indexed at 75.7 while New York-Newark-Jersey City is at 148.6 (national average = 100). New York-Newark-Jersey City has higher rents.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities (2024). Index where national average = 100.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost Editorial