Overall
- Great Falls
- 96.8
- Reading
- 97.1
Diff +0.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Reading is 0.2% more expensive than Great Falls.
Reading, PA is 0.2% more expensive than Great Falls, MT on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 97.1 vs 96.8). A $100,000 salary in Great Falls buys about the same as $100,222 in Reading; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair MT:PA 96.8→97.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Great Falls, MT and Reading, PA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Reading is 35.2 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Great Falls to $100,222 in Reading, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff +4.7 RPP
Diff +35.2 RPP
Diff -11.7 RPP
| Category | Great Falls | Reading | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.8 | 97.1 | +0.2 |
| Goods | 96.0 | 100.7 | +4.7 |
| Services | 73.0 | 108.2 | +35.2 |
| Rents | 97.1 | 85.4 | -11.7 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Great Falls would need to be in Reading for the same purchasing power:
| In Great Falls | In Reading | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,111 | +$111 |
| $75,000 | $75,167 | +$167 |
| $100,000 | $100,222 | +$222 |
| $150,000 | $150,333 | +$333 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.8 → 97.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Reading is 0.2% more expensive than Great Falls. The overall cost index is 97.1 vs 96.8 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Great Falls has the same purchasing power as $100,222 in Reading. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Great Falls are indexed at 97.1 while Reading is at 85.4 (national average = 100). Great Falls has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.