Overall
- Great Falls
- 96.8
- Asheville
- 96.5
Diff -0.3 RPP
Great Falls vs Asheville
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Asheville is 0.4% less expensive than Great Falls.
0.4% less expensive
Asheville, NC is 0.4% less expensive than Great Falls, MT on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.5 vs 96.8). A $100,000 salary in Great Falls buys about the same as $99,650 in Asheville; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 96.8 (Great Falls) vs 96.5 (Asheville)
- $100k in Great Falls ≈ $99,650 purchasing power in Asheville
- Services drives the gap (+15.6 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair MT:NC 96.8→96.5
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE MT × NC
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Great Falls
96.8
Cost Index
Asheville
96.5
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Great Falls, MT and Asheville, NC are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Asheville is 15.6 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Great Falls to $99,650 in Asheville, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Great Falls
- 96.0
- Asheville
- 96.6
Diff +0.6 RPP
Services
- Great Falls
- 73.0
- Asheville
- 88.6
Diff +15.6 RPP
Rents
- Great Falls
- 97.1
- Asheville
- 93.4
Diff -3.7 RPP
| Category | Great Falls | Asheville | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.8 | 96.5 | -0.3 |
| Goods | 96.0 | 96.6 | +0.6 |
| Services | 73.0 | 88.6 | +15.6 |
| Rents | 97.1 | 93.4 | -3.7 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Great Falls 96.8
Asheville 96.5
Goods
Great Falls 96.0
Asheville 96.6
Services
Great Falls 73.0
Asheville 88.6
Rents
Great Falls 97.1
Asheville 93.4
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Great Falls would need to be in Asheville for the same purchasing power:
| In Great Falls | In Asheville | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,825 | $-175 |
| $75,000 | $74,737 | $-263 |
| $100,000 | $99,650 | $-350 |
| $150,000 | $149,475 | $-525 |
$ in Great Falls = in Asheville
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.8 → 96.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Asheville more expensive than Great Falls?
Asheville is 0.4% less expensive than Great Falls. The overall cost index is 96.5 vs 96.8 (national average = 100).
What salary in Asheville equals $100K in Great Falls?
A $100,000 salary in Great Falls has the same purchasing power as $99,650 in Asheville. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Great Falls and Asheville?
Rents in Great Falls are indexed at 97.1 while Asheville is at 93.4 (national average = 100). Great Falls has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.