Overall
- Grants Pass
- 97.8
- Harrisburg-Carlisle
- 98.7
Diff +0.9 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Harrisburg-Carlisle is 0.9% more expensive than Grants Pass.
Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA is 0.9% more expensive than Grants Pass, OR on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.7 vs 97.8). A $100,000 salary in Grants Pass buys about the same as $100,910 in Harrisburg-Carlisle; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair OR:PA 97.8→98.7
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Grants Pass, OR and Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.9 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Harrisburg-Carlisle is 16.4 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Grants Pass corresponds to $100,910 in Harrisburg-Carlisle.
Diff +0.9 RPP
Diff -4.6 RPP
Diff +4.5 RPP
Diff +16.4 RPP
| Category | Grants Pass | Harrisburg-Carlisle | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 97.8 | 98.7 | +0.9 |
| Goods | 105.3 | 100.7 | -4.6 |
| Services | 103.6 | 108.1 | +4.5 |
| Rents | 79.9 | 96.3 | +16.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Grants Pass and Harrisburg-Carlisle share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 2.8 to 0.9 RPP points. Harrisburg-Carlisle remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 34.4 points between the first and latest shared releases (39.0 to 4.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Grants Pass RPP | Harrisburg-Carlisle RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 96.2 | 99.0 | 2.8 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2012 | 96.1 | 97.0 | 0.9 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2016 | 96.2 | 98.2 | 1.9 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2020 | 95.0 | 96.1 | 1.1 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
| 2024 | 97.8 | 98.7 | 0.9 points Harrisburg-Carlisle higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Grants Pass would need to be in Harrisburg-Carlisle for the same purchasing power:
| In Grants Pass | In Harrisburg-Carlisle | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,455 | +$455 |
| $75,000 | $75,683 | +$683 |
| $100,000 | $100,910 | +$910 |
| $150,000 | $151,366 | +$1,366 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (97.8 → 98.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Harrisburg-Carlisle is 0.9% more expensive than Grants Pass. The overall cost index is 98.7 vs 97.8 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Grants Pass has the same purchasing power as $100,910 in Harrisburg-Carlisle. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Grants Pass are indexed at 79.9 while Harrisburg-Carlisle is at 96.3 (national average = 100). Harrisburg-Carlisle has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.