Overall
- Grand Junction
- 95.5
- Logan
- 95.9
Diff +0.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Logan is 0.5% more expensive than Grand Junction.
Logan, UT-ID is 0.5% more expensive than Grand Junction, CO on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.9 vs 95.5). A $100,000 salary in Grand Junction buys about the same as $100,472 in Logan; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair CO:UT 95.5→95.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Grand Junction, CO and Logan, UT-ID are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Logan is 5.4 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Grand Junction to $100,472 in Logan, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.5 RPP
Diff +0.4 RPP
Diff -5.4 RPP
Diff +4.6 RPP
| Category | Grand Junction | Logan | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.5 | 95.9 | +0.5 |
| Goods | 96.1 | 96.4 | +0.4 |
| Services | 83.3 | 77.9 | -5.4 |
| Rents | 86.4 | 91.0 | +4.6 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Grand Junction would need to be in Logan for the same purchasing power:
| In Grand Junction | In Logan | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,236 | +$236 |
| $75,000 | $75,354 | +$354 |
| $100,000 | $100,472 | +$472 |
| $150,000 | $150,709 | +$709 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.5 → 95.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Logan is 0.5% more expensive than Grand Junction. The overall cost index is 95.9 vs 95.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Grand Junction has the same purchasing power as $100,472 in Logan. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Grand Junction are indexed at 86.4 while Logan is at 91.0 (national average = 100). Logan has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.