Grand Junction vs Logan

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Logan is 0.5% more expensive than Grand Junction.

0.5% more expensive

Logan, UT-ID is 0.5% more expensive than Grand Junction, CO on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.9 vs 95.5). A $100,000 salary in Grand Junction buys about the same as $100,472 in Logan; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 95.5 (Grand Junction) vs 95.9 (Logan)
  • $100k in Grand Junction ≈ $100,472 purchasing power in Logan
  • Services drives the gap (-5.4 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair CO:UT 95.5→95.9

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE CO × UT
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Grand Junction
95.5
Cost Index
Logan
95.9
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Grand Junction, CO and Logan, UT-ID are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Logan is 5.4 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Grand Junction to $100,472 in Logan, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Grand Junction
95.5
Logan
95.9
Goods
Grand Junction
96.1
Logan
96.4
Services
Grand Junction
83.3
Logan
77.9
Rents
Grand Junction
86.4
Logan
91.0

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Grand Junction would need to be in Logan for the same purchasing power:

In Grand Junction In Logan Difference
$50,000 $50,236 +$236
$75,000 $75,354 +$354
$100,000 $100,472 +$472
$150,000 $150,709 +$709
$ in Grand Junction = in Logan

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.5 → 95.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Logan more expensive than Grand Junction?

Logan is 0.5% more expensive than Grand Junction. The overall cost index is 95.9 vs 95.5 (national average = 100).

What salary in Logan equals $100K in Grand Junction?

A $100,000 salary in Grand Junction has the same purchasing power as $100,472 in Logan. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Grand Junction and Logan?

Rents in Grand Junction are indexed at 86.4 while Logan is at 91.0 (national average = 100). Logan has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.