Overall
- Grand Junction
- 95.5
- Logan
- 95.9
Diff +0.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Logan is 0.5% more expensive than Grand Junction.
Logan, UT-ID is 0.5% more expensive than Grand Junction, CO on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.9 vs 95.5). A $100,000 salary in Grand Junction buys about the same as $100,472 in Logan; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair CO:UT 95.5→95.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Grand Junction, CO and Logan, UT-ID are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Logan is 5.4 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Grand Junction to $100,472 in Logan, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.5 RPP
Diff +0.4 RPP
Diff -5.4 RPP
Diff +4.6 RPP
| Category | Grand Junction | Logan | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.5 | 95.9 | +0.5 |
| Goods | 96.1 | 96.4 | +0.4 |
| Services | 83.3 | 77.9 | -5.4 |
| Rents | 86.4 | 91.0 | +4.6 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Grand Junction and Logan share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 8.0 to 0.5 RPP points. Logan remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 48.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (43.4 to 4.6 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Grand Junction RPP | Logan RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 103.7 | 95.8 | 8.0 points Grand Junction higher |
| 2012 | 97.6 | 92.5 | 5.1 points Grand Junction higher |
| 2016 | 98.9 | 94.7 | 4.2 points Grand Junction higher |
| 2020 | 95.2 | 91.3 | 3.8 points Grand Junction higher |
| 2024 | 95.5 | 95.9 | 0.5 points Logan higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Grand Junction would need to be in Logan for the same purchasing power:
| In Grand Junction | In Logan | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,236 | +$236 |
| $75,000 | $75,354 | +$354 |
| $100,000 | $100,472 | +$472 |
| $150,000 | $150,709 | +$709 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.5 → 95.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Logan is 0.5% more expensive than Grand Junction. The overall cost index is 95.9 vs 95.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Grand Junction has the same purchasing power as $100,472 in Logan. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Grand Junction are indexed at 86.4 while Logan is at 91.0 (national average = 100). Logan has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.