Fort Wayne vs Yuma

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Yuma is 0.1% more expensive than Fort Wayne.

0.1% more expensive

Yuma, AZ is 0.1% more expensive than Fort Wayne, IN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 92.6). A $100,000 salary in Fort Wayne buys about the same as $100,145 in Yuma; the largest component gap is goods.

  • Overall RPP 92.6 (Fort Wayne) vs 92.7 (Yuma)
  • $100k in Fort Wayne ≈ $100,145 purchasing power in Yuma
  • Goods drives the gap (+1.9 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair IN:AZ 92.6→92.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · GOODS-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE IN × AZ
  • GOODS-LED Goods-led gap
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Fort Wayne
92.6
Cost Index
Yuma
92.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Fort Wayne, IN and Yuma, AZ are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Goods leads the difference, with Yuma 1.9 points higher than Fort Wayne. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $100,145 in Yuma as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Fort Wayne, then replace the national basket with your own.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Fort Wayne
92.6
Yuma
92.7
Goods
Fort Wayne
94.3
Yuma
96.2
Services
Fort Wayne
86.2
Yuma
87.8
Rents
Fort Wayne
72.3
Yuma
73.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

How the Price Gap Changed

Fort Wayne and Yuma share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 1.1 to 0.1 RPP points. Yuma remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 5.1 points between the first and latest shared releases (3.2 to 1.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Fort Wayne RPP Yuma RPP Relative Gap
2008 93.5 92.4 1.1 points Fort Wayne higher
2012 92.2 93.8 1.6 points Yuma higher
2016 92.0 92.7 0.7 points Yuma higher
2020 89.9 88.7 1.3 points Fort Wayne higher
2024 92.6 92.7 0.1 points Yuma higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Fort Wayne would need to be in Yuma for the same purchasing power:

In Fort Wayne In Yuma Difference
$50,000 $50,072 +$72
$75,000 $75,109 +$109
$100,000 $100,145 +$145
$150,000 $150,217 +$217
$ in Fort Wayne = – in Yuma

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.6 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Yuma more expensive than Fort Wayne?

Yuma is 0.1% more expensive than Fort Wayne. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 92.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Yuma equals $100K in Fort Wayne?

A $100,000 salary in Fort Wayne has the same purchasing power as $100,145 in Yuma. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Fort Wayne and Yuma?

Rents in Fort Wayne are indexed at 72.3 while Yuma is at 73.8 (national average = 100). Yuma has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.