Fond du Lac vs Staunton-Stuarts Draft

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Staunton-Stuarts Draft is 0.6% less expensive than Fond du Lac.

0.6% less expensive

Staunton-Stuarts Draft, VA is 0.6% less expensive than Fond du Lac, WI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.1 vs 91.6). A $100,000 salary in Fond du Lac buys about the same as $99,438 in Staunton-Stuarts Draft; the largest component gap is goods.

  • Overall RPP 91.6 (Fond du Lac) vs 91.1 (Staunton-Stuarts Draft)
  • $100k in Fond du Lac ≈ $99,438 purchasing power in Staunton-Stuarts Draft
  • Goods drives the gap (+3.0 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair WI:VA 91.6→91.1

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE WI × VA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Fond du Lac
91.6
Cost Index
Staunton-Stuarts Draft
91.1
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Fond du Lac, WI and Staunton-Stuarts Draft, VA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Goods creates the largest separation: Staunton-Stuarts Draft is 3.0 points higher. But goods and rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $99,438 in Staunton-Stuarts Draft as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Fond du Lac, then replace the national basket with your own.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Fond du Lac
91.6
Staunton-Stuarts Draft
91.1
Goods
Fond du Lac
93.8
Staunton-Stuarts Draft
96.8
Services
Fond du Lac
91.1
Staunton-Stuarts Draft
89.5
Rents
Fond du Lac
67.3
Staunton-Stuarts Draft
68.2

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Fond du Lac would need to be in Staunton-Stuarts Draft for the same purchasing power:

In Fond du Lac In Staunton-Stuarts Draft Difference
$50,000 $49,719 $-281
$75,000 $74,579 $-421
$100,000 $99,438 $-562
$150,000 $149,157 $-843
$ in Fond du Lac = in Staunton-Stuarts Draft

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.6 → 91.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Staunton-Stuarts Draft more expensive than Fond du Lac?

Staunton-Stuarts Draft is 0.6% less expensive than Fond du Lac. The overall cost index is 91.1 vs 91.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Staunton-Stuarts Draft equals $100K in Fond du Lac?

A $100,000 salary in Fond du Lac has the same purchasing power as $99,438 in Staunton-Stuarts Draft. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Fond du Lac and Staunton-Stuarts Draft?

Rents in Fond du Lac are indexed at 67.3 while Staunton-Stuarts Draft is at 68.2 (national average = 100). Staunton-Stuarts Draft has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.