Florence-Muscle Shoals vs Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim is 33.9% more expensive than Florence-Muscle Shoals.

33.9% more expensive

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA is 33.9% more expensive than Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 113.6 vs 84.8). A $100,000 salary in Florence-Muscle Shoals buys about the same as $133,895 in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 84.8 (Florence-Muscle Shoals) vs 113.6 (Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim)
  • $100k in Florence-Muscle Shoals ≈ $133,895 purchasing power in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
  • Rents drives the gap (+122.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair AL:CA 84.8→113.6

TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-STEEP

  • TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
  • CROSS-STATE AL × CA
  • RENT-LED Rent-led gap
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-STEEP Steep PP convert

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Florence-Muscle Shoals would need to be in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim for the same purchasing power:

In Florence-Muscle Shoals In Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim Difference
$50,000 $66,948 +$16,948
$75,000 $100,421 +$25,421
$100,000 $133,895 +$33,895
$150,000 $200,843 +$50,843
$ in Florence-Muscle Shoals = in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (84.8 → 113.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL and Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 28.7 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim is above 100 while Florence-Muscle Shoals is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

Rents leads the difference, with Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim 122.8 points higher than Florence-Muscle Shoals. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Florence-Muscle Shoals corresponds to $133,895 in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Florence-Muscle Shoals
84.8
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
113.6
Goods
Florence-Muscle Shoals
96.4
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
106.6
Services
Florence-Muscle Shoals
85.8
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
158.6
Rents
Florence-Muscle Shoals
47.7
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
170.4

Vertical line = national average (100)

Florence-Muscle Shoals
84.8
Cost Index
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
113.6
Cost Index

How the Price Gap Changed

Florence-Muscle Shoals and Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 30.1 to 28.7 RPP points. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 47.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (25.5 to 72.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Florence-Muscle Shoals RPP Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim RPP Relative Gap
2008 83.3 113.3 30.1 points Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim higher
2012 88.6 112.1 23.4 points Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim higher
2016 85.9 111.3 25.4 points Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim higher
2020 82.8 113.9 31.1 points Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim higher
2024 84.8 113.6 28.7 points Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim more expensive than Florence-Muscle Shoals?

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim is 33.9% more expensive than Florence-Muscle Shoals. The overall cost index is 113.6 vs 84.8 (national average = 100).

What salary in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim equals $100K in Florence-Muscle Shoals?

A $100,000 salary in Florence-Muscle Shoals has the same purchasing power as $133,895 in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Florence-Muscle Shoals and Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim?

Rents in Florence-Muscle Shoals are indexed at 47.7 while Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim is at 170.4 (national average = 100). Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.