Overall
- Flagstaff
- 100.3
Diff -0.3 RPP
Flagstaff vs Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville is 0.3% less expensive than Flagstaff.
0.3% less expensive
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL is 0.3% less expensive than Flagstaff, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 100.0 vs 100.3). A $100,000 salary in Flagstaff buys about the same as $99,681 in Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 100.3 (Flagstaff) vs 100.0 (Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville)
- $100k in Flagstaff ≈ $99,681 purchasing power in Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville
- Services drives the gap (-5.8 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair AZ:FL 100.3→100.0
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE AZ × FL
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Flagstaff
100.3
Cost Index
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville
100.0
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Flagstaff, AZ and Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville is 5.8 points lower. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Flagstaff to $99,681 in Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Flagstaff
- 96.2
Diff +0.0 RPP
Services
- Flagstaff
- 93.8
Diff -5.8 RPP
Rents
- Flagstaff
- 109.0
Diff +2.8 RPP
| Category | Flagstaff | Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.3 | 100.0 | -0.3 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 96.2 | +0.0 |
| Services | 93.8 | 88.1 | -5.8 |
| Rents | 109.0 | 111.7 | +2.8 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Flagstaff 100.3
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville 100.0
Goods
Flagstaff 96.2
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville 96.2
Services
Flagstaff 93.8
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville 88.1
Rents
Flagstaff 109.0
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville 111.7
Vertical line = national average (100)
How the Price Gap Changed
Flagstaff and Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 0.2 to 0.3 RPP points. Flagstaff remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 16.2 points between the first and latest shared releases (10.5 to 5.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Flagstaff RPP | Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 99.8 | 99.9 | 0.2 points Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville higher |
| 2012 | 99.2 | 98.0 | 1.2 points Flagstaff higher |
| 2016 | 97.7 | 98.8 | 1.1 points Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville higher |
| 2020 | 97.0 | 96.8 | 0.3 points Flagstaff higher |
| 2024 | 100.3 | 100.0 | 0.3 points Flagstaff higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Flagstaff would need to be in Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville for the same purchasing power:
| In Flagstaff | In Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,841 | $-159 |
| $75,000 | $74,761 | $-239 |
| $100,000 | $99,681 | $-319 |
| $150,000 | $149,522 | $-478 |
$ in Flagstaff = in Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.3 → 100.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville more expensive than Flagstaff?
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville is 0.3% less expensive than Flagstaff. The overall cost index is 100.0 vs 100.3 (national average = 100).
What salary in Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville equals $100K in Flagstaff?
A $100,000 salary in Flagstaff has the same purchasing power as $99,681 in Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Flagstaff and Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville?
Rents in Flagstaff are indexed at 109.0 while Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville is at 111.7 (national average = 100). Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.