PlainCost
Home / Compare /

Fargo vs Walla Walla

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Walla Walla is 8.4% more expensive than Fargo.

8.4% more expensive

Walla Walla, WA is 8.4% more expensive than Fargo, ND-MN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.5 vs 90.9). A $100,000 salary in Fargo buys about the same as $108,416 in Walla Walla; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 90.9 (Fargo) vs 98.5 (Walla Walla)
  • $100k in Fargo ≈ $108,416 purchasing power in Walla Walla
  • Services drives the gap (+17.0 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair ND:WA 90.9→98.5

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE ND × WA
  • SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

Walla Walla, WA is 8.4% more expensive than Fargo, ND-MN, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 7.6-point overall gap.

Services leads the difference, with Walla Walla 17.0 points higher than Fargo. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Fargo to $108,416 in Walla Walla, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Fargo
90.9
Walla Walla
98.5
Goods
Fargo
95.7
Walla Walla
105.0
Services
Fargo
77.3
Walla Walla
94.3
Rents
Fargo
81.1
Walla Walla
86.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Fargo would need to be in Walla Walla for the same purchasing power:

In Fargo In Walla Walla Difference
$50,000 $54,208 +$4,208
$75,000 $81,312 +$6,312
$100,000 $108,416 +$8,416
$150,000 $162,624 +$12,624
$ in Fargo = – in Walla Walla

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.9 → 98.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Fargo
90.9
Cost Index
Walla Walla
98.5
Cost Index
Reverse: Walla Walla → Fargo Fargo Details Walla Walla Details

Also Compare

vs Saginaw vs Rochester vs Clarksville vs Erie vs College Station-Bryan vs Mankato vs Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands vs Boise City

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Walla Walla more expensive than Fargo?

Walla Walla is 8.4% more expensive than Fargo. The overall cost index is 98.5 vs 90.9 (national average = 100).

What salary in Walla Walla equals $100K in Fargo?

A $100,000 salary in Fargo has the same purchasing power as $108,416 in Walla Walla. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Fargo and Walla Walla?

Rents in Fargo are indexed at 81.1 while Walla Walla is at 86.6 (national average = 100). Walla Walla has higher rents.

Data sources

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.