Overall
- Fairbanks-College
- 103.2
- Wilmington
- 96.4
Diff -6.8 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Wilmington is 6.6% less expensive than Fairbanks-College.
Wilmington, NC is 6.6% less expensive than Fairbanks-College, AK on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.4 vs 103.2). A $100,000 salary in Fairbanks-College buys about the same as $93,425 in Wilmington; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair AK:NC 103.2→96.4
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -6.8 RPP
Diff -10.7 RPP
Diff -31.9 RPP
Diff +0.7 RPP
| Category | Fairbanks-College | Wilmington | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.2 | 96.4 | -6.8 |
| Goods | 107.3 | 96.6 | -10.7 |
| Services | 119.8 | 87.9 | -31.9 |
| Rents | 92.6 | 93.2 | +0.7 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Services creates the largest separation: Wilmington is 31.9 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Wilmington, NC is 6.6% less expensive than Fairbanks-College, AK, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 6.8-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Fairbanks-College is above 100 while Wilmington is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Fairbanks-College to $93,425 in Wilmington, but it is not a personal spending weight.
What a salary in Fairbanks-College would need to be in Wilmington for the same purchasing power:
| In Fairbanks-College | In Wilmington | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $46,712 | $-3,288 |
| $75,000 | $70,069 | $-4,931 |
| $100,000 | $93,425 | $-6,575 |
| $150,000 | $140,137 | $-9,863 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.2 → 96.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Fairbanks-College and Wilmington share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 11.5 to 6.8 RPP points. Fairbanks-College remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 37.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (37.2 to 0.7 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Fairbanks-College RPP | Wilmington RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 104.7 | 93.2 | 11.5 points Fairbanks-College higher |
| 2012 | 97.9 | 95.2 | 2.8 points Fairbanks-College higher |
| 2016 | 100.4 | 95.1 | 5.3 points Fairbanks-College higher |
| 2020 | 99.4 | 94.0 | 5.3 points Fairbanks-College higher |
| 2024 | 103.2 | 96.4 | 6.8 points Fairbanks-College higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Wilmington is 6.6% less expensive than Fairbanks-College. The overall cost index is 96.4 vs 103.2 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Fairbanks-College has the same purchasing power as $93,425 in Wilmington. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Fairbanks-College are indexed at 92.6 while Wilmington is at 93.2 (national average = 100). Wilmington has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.