Overall
- Fairbanks-College
- 103.2
- Tucson
- 96.9
Diff -6.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Tucson is 6.1% less expensive than Fairbanks-College.
Tucson, AZ is 6.1% less expensive than Fairbanks-College, AK on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.9 vs 103.2). A $100,000 salary in Fairbanks-College buys about the same as $93,884 in Tucson; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair AK:AZ 103.2→96.9
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Tucson, AZ is 6.1% less expensive than Fairbanks-College, AK, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 6.3-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Fairbanks-College is above 100 while Tucson is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Services leads the difference, with Tucson 30.3 points lower than Fairbanks-College. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Fairbanks-College to $93,884 in Tucson, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Fairbanks-College and Tucson share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 7.6 to 6.3 RPP points. Fairbanks-College remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 24.2 points between the first and latest shared releases (6.0 to 30.3 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Fairbanks-College RPP | Tucson RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 104.7 | 97.1 | 7.6 points Fairbanks-College higher |
| 2012 | 97.9 | 100.6 | 2.6 points Tucson higher |
| 2016 | 100.4 | 96.6 | 3.8 points Fairbanks-College higher |
| 2020 | 99.4 | 94.0 | 5.3 points Fairbanks-College higher |
| 2024 | 103.2 | 96.9 | 6.3 points Fairbanks-College higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff -6.3 RPP
Diff -11.1 RPP
Diff -30.3 RPP
Diff -0.8 RPP
| Category | Fairbanks-College | Tucson | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.2 | 96.9 | -6.3 |
| Goods | 107.3 | 96.2 | -11.1 |
| Services | 119.8 | 89.5 | -30.3 |
| Rents | 92.6 | 91.8 | -0.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Fairbanks-College would need to be in Tucson for the same purchasing power:
| In Fairbanks-College | In Tucson | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $46,942 | $-3,058 |
| $75,000 | $70,413 | $-4,587 |
| $100,000 | $93,884 | $-6,116 |
| $150,000 | $140,826 | $-9,174 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.2 → 96.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Tucson is 6.1% less expensive than Fairbanks-College. The overall cost index is 96.9 vs 103.2 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Fairbanks-College has the same purchasing power as $93,884 in Tucson. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Fairbanks-College are indexed at 92.6 while Tucson is at 91.8 (national average = 100). Fairbanks-College has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.