Overall
- El Paso
- 89.9
- Gulfport-Biloxi
- 90.0
Diff +0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Gulfport-Biloxi is 0.1% more expensive than El Paso.
Gulfport-Biloxi, MS is 0.1% more expensive than El Paso, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.0 vs 89.9). A $100,000 salary in El Paso buys about the same as $100,105 in Gulfport-Biloxi; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair TX:MS 89.9→90.0
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
El Paso, TX and Gulfport-Biloxi, MS are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Gulfport-Biloxi is 6.2 points lower. But services and rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in El Paso to $100,105 in Gulfport-Biloxi, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.1 RPP
Diff +2.5 RPP
Diff -6.2 RPP
Diff -3.3 RPP
| Category | El Paso | Gulfport-Biloxi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 89.9 | 90.0 | +0.1 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 96.2 | +2.5 |
| Services | 82.6 | 76.3 | -6.2 |
| Rents | 71.2 | 67.9 | -3.3 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
El Paso and Gulfport-Biloxi share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 2.8 to 0.1 RPP points. Gulfport-Biloxi remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 18.6 points between the first and latest shared releases (15.2 to 3.3 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | El Paso RPP | Gulfport-Biloxi RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 92.5 | 95.3 | 2.8 points Gulfport-Biloxi higher |
| 2012 | 95.6 | 94.3 | 1.3 points El Paso higher |
| 2016 | 95.2 | 92.5 | 2.7 points El Paso higher |
| 2020 | 92.7 | 89.2 | 3.5 points El Paso higher |
| 2024 | 89.9 | 90.0 | 0.1 points Gulfport-Biloxi higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in El Paso would need to be in Gulfport-Biloxi for the same purchasing power:
| In El Paso | In Gulfport-Biloxi | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,052 | +$52 |
| $75,000 | $75,078 | +$78 |
| $100,000 | $100,105 | +$105 |
| $150,000 | $150,157 | +$157 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (89.9 → 90.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Gulfport-Biloxi is 0.1% more expensive than El Paso. The overall cost index is 90.0 vs 89.9 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in El Paso has the same purchasing power as $100,105 in Gulfport-Biloxi. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in El Paso are indexed at 71.2 while Gulfport-Biloxi is at 67.9 (national average = 100). El Paso has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.