Overall
- Eagle Pass
- 83.8
- Napa
- 112.6
Diff +28.7 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Napa is 34.3% more expensive than Eagle Pass.
Napa, CA is 34.3% more expensive than Eagle Pass, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 112.6 vs 83.8). A $100,000 salary in Eagle Pass buys about the same as $134,305 in Napa; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair TX:CA 83.8→112.6
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-STEEP
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What a salary in Eagle Pass would need to be in Napa for the same purchasing power:
| In Eagle Pass | In Napa | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $67,152 | +$17,152 |
| $75,000 | $100,728 | +$25,728 |
| $100,000 | $134,305 | +$34,305 |
| $150,000 | $201,457 | +$51,457 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (83.8 → 112.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Eagle Pass, TX and Napa, CA sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 28.7 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Napa is above 100 while Eagle Pass is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Rents leads the difference, with Napa 143.8 points higher than Eagle Pass. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Eagle Pass corresponds to $134,305 in Napa.
Diff +28.7 RPP
Diff +11.4 RPP
Diff +74.7 RPP
Diff +143.8 RPP
| Category | Eagle Pass | Napa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 83.8 | 112.6 | +28.7 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 105.2 | +11.4 |
| Services | 81.9 | 156.5 | +74.7 |
| Rents | 53.7 | 197.4 | +143.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Eagle Pass and Napa share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 30.8 to 28.7 RPP points. Napa remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 54.2 points between the first and latest shared releases (89.6 to 143.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Eagle Pass RPP | Napa RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 84.4 | 115.2 | 30.8 points Napa higher |
| 2012 | 85.9 | 111.6 | 25.7 points Napa higher |
| 2016 | 84.6 | 117.8 | 33.2 points Napa higher |
| 2020 | 89.1 | 112.2 | 23.1 points Napa higher |
| 2024 | 83.8 | 112.6 | 28.7 points Napa higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Napa is 34.3% more expensive than Eagle Pass. The overall cost index is 112.6 vs 83.8 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Eagle Pass has the same purchasing power as $134,305 in Napa. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Eagle Pass are indexed at 53.7 while Napa is at 197.4 (national average = 100). Napa has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.