Dubuque vs Waterloo-Cedar Falls

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Waterloo-Cedar Falls is 0.3% less expensive than Dubuque.

0.3% less expensive

Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA is 0.3% less expensive than Dubuque, IA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 87.1 vs 87.3). A $100,000 salary in Dubuque buys about the same as $99,690 in Waterloo-Cedar Falls; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 87.3 (Dubuque) vs 87.1 (Waterloo-Cedar Falls)
  • $100k in Dubuque ≈ $99,690 purchasing power in Waterloo-Cedar Falls
  • Services drives the gap (+2.5 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair IA:IA 87.3→87.1

PHOTO-FINISH · SAME-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • SAME-STATE Same state · IA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Dubuque
87.3
Cost Index
Waterloo-Cedar Falls
87.1
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Dubuque, IA and Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Waterloo-Cedar Falls is 2.5 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Dubuque to $99,690 in Waterloo-Cedar Falls, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Dubuque
87.3
Waterloo-Cedar Falls
87.1
Goods
Dubuque
93.7
Waterloo-Cedar Falls
93.7
Services
Dubuque
81.2
Waterloo-Cedar Falls
83.7
Rents
Dubuque
64.0
Waterloo-Cedar Falls
63.1

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Dubuque would need to be in Waterloo-Cedar Falls for the same purchasing power:

In Dubuque In Waterloo-Cedar Falls Difference
$50,000 $49,845 $-155
$75,000 $74,767 $-233
$100,000 $99,690 $-310
$150,000 $149,535 $-465
$ in Dubuque = in Waterloo-Cedar Falls

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (87.3 → 87.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Waterloo-Cedar Falls more expensive than Dubuque?

Waterloo-Cedar Falls is 0.3% less expensive than Dubuque. The overall cost index is 87.1 vs 87.3 (national average = 100).

What salary in Waterloo-Cedar Falls equals $100K in Dubuque?

A $100,000 salary in Dubuque has the same purchasing power as $99,690 in Waterloo-Cedar Falls. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Dubuque and Waterloo-Cedar Falls?

Rents in Dubuque are indexed at 64.0 while Waterloo-Cedar Falls is at 63.1 (national average = 100). Dubuque has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.