Overall
- Merced
- 98.3
Diff +5.6 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Merced is 6% more expensive than Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek.
Merced, CA is 6% more expensive than Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 92.7). A $100,000 salary in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek buys about the same as $106,021 in Merced; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair OH:CA 92.7→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Merced, CA is 6% more expensive than Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.6-point overall gap.
Services leads the difference, with Merced 62.9 points higher than Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek to $106,021 in Merced, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek and Merced share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 1.8 to 5.6 RPP points. Merced remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 60.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (2.0 to 62.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek RPP | Merced RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 96.0 | 94.3 | 1.8 points Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek higher |
| 2012 | 93.1 | 98.6 | 5.5 points Merced higher |
| 2016 | 92.7 | 95.3 | 2.6 points Merced higher |
| 2020 | 91.8 | 98.7 | 6.9 points Merced higher |
| 2024 | 92.7 | 98.3 | 5.6 points Merced higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff +5.6 RPP
Diff +11.5 RPP
Diff +62.9 RPP
Diff +5.9 RPP
| Category | Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek | Merced | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.7 | 98.3 | +5.6 |
| Goods | 93.6 | 105.2 | +11.5 |
| Services | 95.4 | 158.3 | +62.9 |
| Rents | 72.7 | 78.6 | +5.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek would need to be in Merced for the same purchasing power:
| In Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek | In Merced | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $53,010 | +$3,010 |
| $75,000 | $79,516 | +$4,516 |
| $100,000 | $106,021 | +$6,021 |
| $150,000 | $159,031 | +$9,031 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.7 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Merced is 6% more expensive than Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 92.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek has the same purchasing power as $106,021 in Merced. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek are indexed at 72.7 while Merced is at 78.6 (national average = 100). Merced has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.