Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek vs Appleton

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Appleton is 0.3% less expensive than Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek.

0.3% less expensive

Appleton, WI is 0.3% less expensive than Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.4 vs 92.7). A $100,000 salary in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek buys about the same as $99,703 in Appleton; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 92.7 (Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek) vs 92.4 (Appleton)
  • $100k in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek ≈ $99,703 purchasing power in Appleton
  • Services drives the gap (-4.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair OH:WI 92.7→92.4

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE OH × WI
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek
92.7
Cost Index
Appleton
92.4
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH and Appleton, WI are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Appleton is 4.8 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek to $99,703 in Appleton, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek
92.7
Appleton
92.4
Goods
Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek
93.6
Appleton
93.8
Services
Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek
95.4
Appleton
90.6
Rents
Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek
72.7
Appleton
70.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek would need to be in Appleton for the same purchasing power:

In Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek In Appleton Difference
$50,000 $49,852 $-148
$75,000 $74,777 $-223
$100,000 $99,703 $-297
$150,000 $149,555 $-445
$ in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek = in Appleton

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.7 → 92.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Appleton more expensive than Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek?

Appleton is 0.3% less expensive than Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek. The overall cost index is 92.4 vs 92.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in Appleton equals $100K in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek?

A $100,000 salary in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek has the same purchasing power as $99,703 in Appleton. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek and Appleton?

Rents in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek are indexed at 72.7 while Appleton is at 70.8 (national average = 100). Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.