Overall
- Pittsfield
- 95.1
Diff +0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Pittsfield is 0.4% more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley.
Pittsfield, MA is 0.4% more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley, AL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.1 vs 94.7). A $100,000 salary in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley buys about the same as $100,439 in Pittsfield; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair AL:MA 94.7→95.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley, AL and Pittsfield, MA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Pittsfield is 70.4 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley to $100,439 in Pittsfield, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.4 RPP
Diff +0.6 RPP
Diff +70.4 RPP
Diff -15.7 RPP
| Category | Daphne-Fairhope-Foley | Pittsfield | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 94.7 | 95.1 | +0.4 |
| Goods | 96.4 | 97.0 | +0.6 |
| Services | 83.3 | 153.7 | +70.4 |
| Rents | 89.2 | 73.5 | -15.7 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley would need to be in Pittsfield for the same purchasing power:
| In Daphne-Fairhope-Foley | In Pittsfield | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,220 | +$220 |
| $75,000 | $75,329 | +$329 |
| $100,000 | $100,439 | +$439 |
| $150,000 | $150,659 | +$659 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (94.7 → 95.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Pittsfield is 0.4% more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley. The overall cost index is 95.1 vs 94.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley has the same purchasing power as $100,439 in Pittsfield. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley are indexed at 89.2 while Pittsfield is at 73.5 (national average = 100). Daphne-Fairhope-Foley has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.