Overall
- Lancaster
- 98.3
Diff +3.6 RPP
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley vs Lancaster
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lancaster is 3.8% more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley.
3.8% more expensive
Lancaster, PA is 3.8% more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley, AL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 94.7). A $100,000 salary in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley buys about the same as $103,767 in Lancaster; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 94.7 (Daphne-Fairhope-Foley) vs 98.3 (Lancaster)
- $100k in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley ≈ $103,767 purchasing power in Lancaster
- Services drives the gap (+24.0 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair AL:PA 94.7→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- CROSS-STATE AL × PA
- SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Lancaster, PA is 3.8% more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley, AL, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 3.6-point overall gap.
Services leads the difference, with Lancaster 24.0 points higher than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley to $103,767 in Lancaster, but it is not a personal spending weight.
How the Price Gap Changed
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley and Lancaster share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 4.9 to 3.6 RPP points. Lancaster remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 5.4 points between the first and latest shared releases (18.6 to 24.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Daphne-Fairhope-Foley RPP | Lancaster RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 95.3 | 100.2 | 4.9 points Lancaster higher |
| 2012 | 95.9 | 97.8 | 1.9 points Lancaster higher |
| 2016 | 94.8 | 99.4 | 4.5 points Lancaster higher |
| 2020 | 90.8 | 97.9 | 7.1 points Lancaster higher |
| 2024 | 94.7 | 98.3 | 3.6 points Lancaster higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Lancaster
- 100.7
Diff +4.3 RPP
Services
- Lancaster
- 107.3
Diff +24.0 RPP
Rents
- Lancaster
- 93.8
Diff +4.7 RPP
| Category | Daphne-Fairhope-Foley | Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 94.7 | 98.3 | +3.6 |
| Goods | 96.4 | 100.7 | +4.3 |
| Services | 83.3 | 107.3 | +24.0 |
| Rents | 89.2 | 93.8 | +4.7 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley 94.7
Lancaster 98.3
Goods
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley 96.4
Lancaster 100.7
Services
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley 83.3
Lancaster 107.3
Rents
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley 89.2
Lancaster 93.8
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley would need to be in Lancaster for the same purchasing power:
| In Daphne-Fairhope-Foley | In Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,884 | +$1,884 |
| $75,000 | $77,825 | +$2,825 |
| $100,000 | $103,767 | +$3,767 |
| $150,000 | $155,651 | +$5,651 |
$ in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley = in Lancaster
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (94.7 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
94.7
Cost Index
Lancaster
98.3
Cost Index
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Lancaster more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley?
Lancaster is 3.8% more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 94.7 (national average = 100).
What salary in Lancaster equals $100K in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley?
A $100,000 salary in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley has the same purchasing power as $103,767 in Lancaster. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Daphne-Fairhope-Foley and Lancaster?
Rents in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley are indexed at 89.2 while Lancaster is at 93.8 (national average = 100). Lancaster has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.