Daphne-Fairhope-Foley vs Harrisonburg

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Harrisonburg is 0.2% more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley.

0.2% more expensive

Harrisonburg, VA is 0.2% more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley, AL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 94.9 vs 94.7). A $100,000 salary in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley buys about the same as $100,213 in Harrisonburg; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 94.7 (Daphne-Fairhope-Foley) vs 94.9 (Harrisonburg)
  • $100k in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley ≈ $100,213 purchasing power in Harrisonburg
  • Rents drives the gap (-6.9 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair AL:VA 94.7→94.9

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE AL × VA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
94.7
Cost Index
Harrisonburg
94.9
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Daphne-Fairhope-Foley, AL and Harrisonburg, VA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Harrisonburg is 6.9 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley corresponds to $100,213 in Harrisonburg.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
94.7
Harrisonburg
94.9
Goods
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
96.4
Harrisonburg
96.8
Services
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
83.3
Harrisonburg
88.5
Rents
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
89.2
Harrisonburg
82.3

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley would need to be in Harrisonburg for the same purchasing power:

In Daphne-Fairhope-Foley In Harrisonburg Difference
$50,000 $50,107 +$107
$75,000 $75,160 +$160
$100,000 $100,213 +$213
$150,000 $150,320 +$320
$ in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley = in Harrisonburg

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (94.7 → 94.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Harrisonburg more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley?

Harrisonburg is 0.2% more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley. The overall cost index is 94.9 vs 94.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in Harrisonburg equals $100K in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley?

A $100,000 salary in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley has the same purchasing power as $100,213 in Harrisonburg. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Daphne-Fairhope-Foley and Harrisonburg?

Rents in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley are indexed at 89.2 while Harrisonburg is at 82.3 (national average = 100). Daphne-Fairhope-Foley has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.