Overall
- Coeur d'Alene
- 98.3
Diff +7.1 RPP
Coeur d'Alene vs Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro is 7.3% more expensive than Coeur d'Alene.
7.3% more expensive
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA is 7.3% more expensive than Coeur d'Alene, ID on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 105.4 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Coeur d'Alene buys about the same as $107,252 in Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 98.3 (Coeur d'Alene) vs 105.4 (Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro)
- $100k in Coeur d'Alene ≈ $107,252 purchasing power in Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro
- Services drives the gap (+36.2 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair ID:OR 98.3→105.4
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- CROSS-STATE ID × OR
- SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA is 7.3% more expensive than Coeur d'Alene, ID, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 7.1-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro is above 100 while Coeur d'Alene is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Services leads the difference, with Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro 36.2 points higher than Coeur d'Alene. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Coeur d'Alene to $107,252 in Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, but it is not a personal spending weight.
How the Price Gap Changed
Coeur d'Alene and Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 0.6 to 7.1 RPP points. Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 19.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (10.0 to 9.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Coeur d'Alene RPP | Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 98.1 | 98.7 | 0.6 points Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro higher |
| 2012 | 94.9 | 104.3 | 9.5 points Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro higher |
| 2016 | 97.5 | 101.5 | 4.0 points Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro higher |
| 2020 | 93.0 | 105.8 | 12.8 points Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro higher |
| 2024 | 98.3 | 105.4 | 7.1 points Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Coeur d'Alene
- 96.2
Diff +9.0 RPP
Services
- Coeur d'Alene
- 70.8
Diff +36.2 RPP
Rents
- Coeur d'Alene
- 105.6
Diff +19.5 RPP
| Category | Coeur d'Alene | Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.3 | 105.4 | +7.1 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 105.2 | +9.0 |
| Services | 70.8 | 107.0 | +36.2 |
| Rents | 105.6 | 125.1 | +19.5 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Coeur d'Alene 98.3
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro 105.4
Goods
Coeur d'Alene 96.2
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro 105.2
Services
Coeur d'Alene 70.8
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro 107.0
Rents
Coeur d'Alene 105.6
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro 125.1
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Coeur d'Alene would need to be in Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro for the same purchasing power:
| In Coeur d'Alene | In Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $53,626 | +$3,626 |
| $75,000 | $80,439 | +$5,439 |
| $100,000 | $107,252 | +$7,252 |
| $150,000 | $160,878 | +$10,878 |
$ in Coeur d'Alene = in Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 105.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Coeur d'Alene
98.3
Cost Index
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro
105.4
Cost Index
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro more expensive than Coeur d'Alene?
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro is 7.3% more expensive than Coeur d'Alene. The overall cost index is 105.4 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).
What salary in Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro equals $100K in Coeur d'Alene?
A $100,000 salary in Coeur d'Alene has the same purchasing power as $107,252 in Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Coeur d'Alene and Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro?
Rents in Coeur d'Alene are indexed at 105.6 while Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro is at 125.1 (national average = 100). Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.