Coeur d'Alene vs Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 5.5% more expensive than Coeur d'Alene.

5.5% more expensive

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 5.5% more expensive than Coeur d'Alene, ID on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.7 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Coeur d'Alene buys about the same as $105,470 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 98.3 (Coeur d'Alene) vs 103.7 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater)
  • $100k in Coeur d'Alene ≈ $105,470 purchasing power in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
  • Services drives the gap (+20.9 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair ID:WA 98.3→103.7

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE ID × WA
  • SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 5.5% more expensive than Coeur d'Alene, ID, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.4-point overall gap.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is above 100 while Coeur d'Alene is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

Services leads the difference, with Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 20.9 points higher than Coeur d'Alene. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Coeur d'Alene to $105,470 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Coeur d'Alene
98.3
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Goods
Coeur d'Alene
96.2
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
105.0
Services
Coeur d'Alene
70.8
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
91.7
Rents
Coeur d'Alene
105.6
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
116.7

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Coeur d'Alene would need to be in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater for the same purchasing power:

In Coeur d'Alene In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater Difference
$50,000 $52,735 +$2,735
$75,000 $79,103 +$4,103
$100,000 $105,470 +$5,470
$150,000 $158,206 +$8,206
$ in Coeur d'Alene = in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 103.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Coeur d'Alene
98.3
Cost Index
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater more expensive than Coeur d'Alene?

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 5.5% more expensive than Coeur d'Alene. The overall cost index is 103.7 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).

What salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater equals $100K in Coeur d'Alene?

A $100,000 salary in Coeur d'Alene has the same purchasing power as $105,470 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Coeur d'Alene and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?

Rents in Coeur d'Alene are indexed at 105.6 while Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is at 116.7 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.