Clarksville vs Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers is 0.4% more expensive than Clarksville.

0.4% more expensive

Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR is 0.4% more expensive than Clarksville, TN-KY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.4 vs 90.9). A $100,000 salary in Clarksville buys about the same as $100,446 in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 90.9 (Clarksville) vs 91.4 (Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers)
  • $100k in Clarksville ≈ $100,446 purchasing power in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
  • Rents drives the gap (+3.1 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair TN:AR 90.9→91.4

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE TN × AR
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Clarksville
90.9
Cost Index
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
91.4
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Clarksville, TN-KY and Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers is 3.1 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Clarksville corresponds to $100,446 in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Clarksville
90.9
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
91.4
Goods
Clarksville
96.2
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
93.6
Services
Clarksville
72.5
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
75.1
Rents
Clarksville
73.8
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
76.9

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Clarksville would need to be in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers for the same purchasing power:

In Clarksville In Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers Difference
$50,000 $50,223 +$223
$75,000 $75,335 +$335
$100,000 $100,446 +$446
$150,000 $150,670 +$670
$ in Clarksville = in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.9 → 91.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers more expensive than Clarksville?

Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers is 0.4% more expensive than Clarksville. The overall cost index is 91.4 vs 90.9 (national average = 100).

What salary in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers equals $100K in Clarksville?

A $100,000 salary in Clarksville has the same purchasing power as $100,446 in Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Clarksville and Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers?

Rents in Clarksville are indexed at 73.8 while Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers is at 76.9 (national average = 100). Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.