Overall
- Chico
- 101.2
Diff -2.9 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Prescott Valley-Prescott is 2.9% less expensive than Chico.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 2.9% less expensive than Chico, CA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 101.2). A $100,000 salary in Chico buys about the same as $97,093 in Prescott Valley-Prescott; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair CA:AZ 101.2→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -2.9 RPP
Diff -8.9 RPP
Diff -67.4 RPP
Diff +6.8 RPP
| Category | Chico | Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 101.2 | 98.3 | -2.9 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 96.2 | -8.9 |
| Services | 158.8 | 91.5 | -67.4 |
| Rents | 91.9 | 98.8 | +6.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Services creates the largest separation: Prescott Valley-Prescott is 67.4 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 2.9% less expensive than Chico, CA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.9-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Chico is above 100 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Chico to $97,093 in Prescott Valley-Prescott, but it is not a personal spending weight.
What a salary in Chico would need to be in Prescott Valley-Prescott for the same purchasing power:
| In Chico | In Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $48,546 | $-1,454 |
| $75,000 | $72,820 | $-2,180 |
| $100,000 | $97,093 | $-2,907 |
| $150,000 | $145,639 | $-4,361 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (101.2 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Chico and Prescott Valley-Prescott share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 3.6 to 2.9 RPP points. Chico remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 52.5 points between the first and latest shared releases (14.9 to 67.4 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Chico RPP | Prescott Valley-Prescott RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 99.4 | 103.0 | 3.6 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2012 | 103.5 | 96.5 | 6.9 points Chico higher |
| 2016 | 97.1 | 98.6 | 1.5 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2020 | 101.8 | 93.2 | 8.6 points Chico higher |
| 2024 | 101.2 | 98.3 | 2.9 points Chico higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Prescott Valley-Prescott is 2.9% less expensive than Chico. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 101.2 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Chico has the same purchasing power as $97,093 in Prescott Valley-Prescott. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Chico are indexed at 91.9 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is at 98.8 (national average = 100). Prescott Valley-Prescott has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.