Chicago-Naperville-Elgin vs Modesto

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Modesto is 0.5% more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin.

0.5% more expensive

Modesto, CA is 0.5% more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 104.1 vs 103.6). A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin buys about the same as $100,495 in Modesto; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 103.6 (Chicago-Naperville-Elgin) vs 104.1 (Modesto)
  • $100k in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin ≈ $100,495 purchasing power in Modesto
  • Services drives the gap (+68.7 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair IL:CA 103.6→104.1

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE IL × CA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Cost Index
Modesto
104.1
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN and Modesto, CA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Modesto is 68.7 points higher. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin to $100,495 in Modesto, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Modesto
104.1
Goods
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
107.3
Modesto
105.2
Services
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
83.6
Modesto
152.3
Rents
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
112.0
Modesto
108.5

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin would need to be in Modesto for the same purchasing power:

In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin In Modesto Difference
$50,000 $50,248 +$248
$75,000 $75,371 +$371
$100,000 $100,495 +$495
$150,000 $150,743 +$743
$ in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin = in Modesto

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.6 → 104.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Modesto more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?

Modesto is 0.5% more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. The overall cost index is 104.1 vs 103.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Modesto equals $100K in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?

A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has the same purchasing power as $100,495 in Modesto. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Chicago-Naperville-Elgin and Modesto?

Rents in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin are indexed at 112.0 while Modesto is at 108.5 (national average = 100). Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.