Chicago-Naperville-Elgin vs Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal is 5.4% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin.

5.4% less expensive

Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal, SC is 5.4% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.0 vs 103.6). A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin buys about the same as $94,616 in Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal; the largest component gap is goods.

  • Overall RPP 103.6 (Chicago-Naperville-Elgin) vs 98.0 (Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal)
  • $100k in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin ≈ $94,616 purchasing power in Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal
  • Goods drives the gap (-10.9 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair IL:SC 103.6→98.0

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE IL × SC
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal
98.0
Goods
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
107.3
Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal
96.3
Services
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
83.6
Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal
88.1
Rents
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
112.0
Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal
101.2

Vertical line = national average (100)

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Goods creates the largest separation: Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal is 10.9 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal, SC is 5.4% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.6-point overall gap.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is above 100 while Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $94,616 in Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, then replace the national basket with your own.

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Cost Index
Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal
98.0
Cost Index

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin would need to be in Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal for the same purchasing power:

In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin In Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal Difference
$50,000 $47,308 $-2,692
$75,000 $70,962 $-4,038
$100,000 $94,616 $-5,384
$150,000 $141,923 $-8,077
$ in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin = in Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.6 → 98.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

How the Price Gap Changed

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin and Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 10.4 to 5.6 RPP points. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 22.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (17.5 to 4.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Chicago-Naperville-Elgin RPP Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal RPP Relative Gap
2008 105.4 95.1 10.4 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher
2012 105.1 93.6 11.6 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher
2016 103.8 96.0 7.8 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher
2020 104.5 93.6 10.9 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher
2024 103.6 98.0 5.6 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?

Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal is 5.4% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. The overall cost index is 98.0 vs 103.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal equals $100K in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?

A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has the same purchasing power as $94,616 in Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Chicago-Naperville-Elgin and Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal?

Rents in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin are indexed at 112.0 while Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal is at 101.2 (national average = 100). Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.