Overall
- Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
- 103.6
- Great Falls
- 96.8
Diff -6.8 RPP
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin vs Great Falls
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Great Falls is 6.5% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin.
6.5% less expensive
Great Falls, MT is 6.5% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.8 vs 103.6). A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin buys about the same as $93,484 in Great Falls; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 103.6 (Chicago-Naperville-Elgin) vs 96.8 (Great Falls)
- $100k in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin ≈ $93,484 purchasing power in Great Falls
- Rents drives the gap (-14.9 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair IL:MT 103.6→96.8
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- CROSS-STATE IL × MT
- RENT-LED Rent-led gap
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin would need to be in Great Falls for the same purchasing power:
| In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | In Great Falls | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $46,742 | $-3,258 |
| $75,000 | $70,113 | $-4,887 |
| $100,000 | $93,484 | $-6,516 |
| $150,000 | $140,226 | $-9,774 |
$ in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin = in Great Falls
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.6 → 96.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Great Falls, MT is 6.5% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 6.8-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is above 100 while Great Falls is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Rents leads the difference, with Great Falls 14.9 points lower than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin corresponds to $93,484 in Great Falls.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
- 107.3
- Great Falls
- 96.0
Diff -11.3 RPP
Services
- Great Falls
- 73.0
Diff -10.5 RPP
Rents
- Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
- 112.0
- Great Falls
- 97.1
Diff -14.9 RPP
| Category | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | Great Falls | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.6 | 96.8 | -6.8 |
| Goods | 107.3 | 96.0 | -11.3 |
| Services | 83.6 | 73.0 | -10.5 |
| Rents | 112.0 | 97.1 | -14.9 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 103.6
Great Falls 96.8
Goods
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 107.3
Great Falls 96.0
Services
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 83.6
Great Falls 73.0
Rents
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 112.0
Great Falls 97.1
Vertical line = national average (100)
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Cost Index
Great Falls
96.8
Cost Index
How the Price Gap Changed
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin and Great Falls share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 20.2 to 6.8 RPP points. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 70.1 points between the first and latest shared releases (85.0 to 14.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin RPP | Great Falls RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 105.4 | 85.3 | 20.2 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
| 2012 | 105.1 | 92.3 | 12.8 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
| 2016 | 103.8 | 88.0 | 15.8 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
| 2020 | 104.5 | 87.0 | 17.5 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
| 2024 | 103.6 | 96.8 | 6.8 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Great Falls more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?
Great Falls is 6.5% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. The overall cost index is 96.8 vs 103.6 (national average = 100).
What salary in Great Falls equals $100K in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?
A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has the same purchasing power as $93,484 in Great Falls. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Chicago-Naperville-Elgin and Great Falls?
Rents in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin are indexed at 112.0 while Great Falls is at 97.1 (national average = 100). Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.