Overall
- Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
- 103.6
- Elkhart-Goshen
- 90.3
Diff -13.3 RPP
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin vs Elkhart-Goshen
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Elkhart-Goshen is 12.8% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin.
12.8% less expensive
Elkhart-Goshen, IN is 12.8% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.3 vs 103.6). A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin buys about the same as $87,191 in Elkhart-Goshen; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 103.6 (Chicago-Naperville-Elgin) vs 90.3 (Elkhart-Goshen)
- $100k in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin ≈ $87,191 purchasing power in Elkhart-Goshen
- Rents drives the gap (-47.7 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair IL:IN 103.6→90.3
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
- CROSS-STATE IL × IN
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
- 107.3
- Elkhart-Goshen
- 94.3
Diff -12.9 RPP
Services
- Elkhart-Goshen
- 86.4
Diff +2.8 RPP
Rents
- Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
- 112.0
- Elkhart-Goshen
- 64.3
Diff -47.7 RPP
| Category | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | Elkhart-Goshen | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.6 | 90.3 | -13.3 |
| Goods | 107.3 | 94.3 | -12.9 |
| Services | 83.6 | 86.4 | +2.8 |
| Rents | 112.0 | 64.3 | -47.7 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 103.6
Elkhart-Goshen 90.3
Goods
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 107.3
Elkhart-Goshen 94.3
Services
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 83.6
Elkhart-Goshen 86.4
Rents
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 112.0
Elkhart-Goshen 64.3
Vertical line = national average (100)
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Rents creates the largest separation: Elkhart-Goshen is 47.7 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN and Elkhart-Goshen, IN sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 13.3 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is above 100 while Elkhart-Goshen is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin corresponds to $87,191 in Elkhart-Goshen.
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Cost Index
Elkhart-Goshen
90.3
Cost Index
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin would need to be in Elkhart-Goshen for the same purchasing power:
| In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | In Elkhart-Goshen | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $43,595 | $-6,405 |
| $75,000 | $65,393 | $-9,607 |
| $100,000 | $87,191 | $-12,809 |
| $150,000 | $130,786 | $-19,214 |
$ in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin = in Elkhart-Goshen
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.6 → 90.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
How the Price Gap Changed
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin and Elkhart-Goshen share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 8.8 to 13.3 RPP points. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 11.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (8.5 to 2.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin RPP | Elkhart-Goshen RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 105.4 | 96.6 | 8.8 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
| 2012 | 105.1 | 92.6 | 12.5 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
| 2016 | 103.8 | 90.1 | 13.7 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
| 2020 | 104.5 | 91.0 | 13.5 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
| 2024 | 103.6 | 90.3 | 13.3 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Elkhart-Goshen more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?
Elkhart-Goshen is 12.8% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. The overall cost index is 90.3 vs 103.6 (national average = 100).
What salary in Elkhart-Goshen equals $100K in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?
A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has the same purchasing power as $87,191 in Elkhart-Goshen. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Chicago-Naperville-Elgin and Elkhart-Goshen?
Rents in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin are indexed at 112.0 while Elkhart-Goshen is at 64.3 (national average = 100). Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.