Chicago-Naperville-Elgin vs Boise City

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Boise City is 5% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin.

5% less expensive

Boise City, ID is 5% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.4 vs 103.6). A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin buys about the same as $94,977 in Boise City; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 103.6 (Chicago-Naperville-Elgin) vs 98.4 (Boise City)
  • $100k in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin ≈ $94,977 purchasing power in Boise City
  • Services drives the gap (-12.9 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair IL:ID 103.6→98.4

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE IL × ID
  • SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Boise City, ID is 5% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.2-point overall gap.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is above 100 while Boise City is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

Services leads the difference, with Boise City 12.9 points lower than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin to $94,977 in Boise City, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Boise City
98.4
Goods
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
107.3
Boise City
96.2
Services
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
83.6
Boise City
70.7
Rents
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
112.0
Boise City
105.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin would need to be in Boise City for the same purchasing power:

In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin In Boise City Difference
$50,000 $47,488 $-2,512
$75,000 $71,232 $-3,768
$100,000 $94,977 $-5,023
$150,000 $142,465 $-7,535
$ in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin = in Boise City

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.6 → 98.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Cost Index
Boise City
98.4
Cost Index

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Boise City more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?

Boise City is 5% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. The overall cost index is 98.4 vs 103.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Boise City equals $100K in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?

A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has the same purchasing power as $94,977 in Boise City. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Chicago-Naperville-Elgin and Boise City?

Rents in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin are indexed at 112.0 while Boise City is at 105.6 (national average = 100). Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.