Overall
- Cheyenne
- 96.5
- Great Falls
- 96.8
Diff +0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Great Falls is 0.4% more expensive than Cheyenne.
Great Falls, MT is 0.4% more expensive than Cheyenne, WY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.8 vs 96.5). A $100,000 salary in Cheyenne buys about the same as $100,367 in Great Falls; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WY:MT 96.5→96.8
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Cheyenne, WY and Great Falls, MT are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Great Falls is 7.3 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Cheyenne corresponds to $100,367 in Great Falls.
Diff +0.4 RPP
Diff +0.6 RPP
Diff -4.9 RPP
Diff +7.3 RPP
| Category | Cheyenne | Great Falls | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.5 | 96.8 | +0.4 |
| Goods | 95.4 | 96.0 | +0.6 |
| Services | 78.0 | 73.0 | -4.9 |
| Rents | 89.8 | 97.1 | +7.3 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Cheyenne would need to be in Great Falls for the same purchasing power:
| In Cheyenne | In Great Falls | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,183 | +$183 |
| $75,000 | $75,275 | +$275 |
| $100,000 | $100,367 | +$367 |
| $150,000 | $150,550 | +$550 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.5 → 96.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Great Falls is 0.4% more expensive than Cheyenne. The overall cost index is 96.8 vs 96.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Cheyenne has the same purchasing power as $100,367 in Great Falls. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Cheyenne are indexed at 89.8 while Great Falls is at 97.1 (national average = 100). Great Falls has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.