Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia vs Milwaukee-Waukesha

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Milwaukee-Waukesha is 0.4% less expensive than Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia.

0.4% less expensive

Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI is 0.4% less expensive than Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.9 vs 97.3). A $100,000 salary in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia buys about the same as $99,578 in Milwaukee-Waukesha; the largest component gap is goods.

  • Overall RPP 97.3 (Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia) vs 96.9 (Milwaukee-Waukesha)
  • $100k in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia ≈ $99,578 purchasing power in Milwaukee-Waukesha
  • Goods drives the gap (-2.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair NC:WI 97.3→96.9

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE NC × WI
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
97.3
Cost Index
Milwaukee-Waukesha
96.9
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC and Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Goods creates the largest separation: Milwaukee-Waukesha is 2.8 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $99,578 in Milwaukee-Waukesha as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, then replace the national basket with your own.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
97.3
Milwaukee-Waukesha
96.9
Goods
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
96.6
Milwaukee-Waukesha
93.8
Services
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
89.2
Milwaukee-Waukesha
91.6
Rents
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
97.6
Milwaukee-Waukesha
97.1

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia would need to be in Milwaukee-Waukesha for the same purchasing power:

In Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia In Milwaukee-Waukesha Difference
$50,000 $49,789 $-211
$75,000 $74,683 $-317
$100,000 $99,578 $-422
$150,000 $149,367 $-633
$ in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia = in Milwaukee-Waukesha

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (97.3 → 96.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Milwaukee-Waukesha more expensive than Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia?

Milwaukee-Waukesha is 0.4% less expensive than Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia. The overall cost index is 96.9 vs 97.3 (national average = 100).

What salary in Milwaukee-Waukesha equals $100K in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia?

A $100,000 salary in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia has the same purchasing power as $99,578 in Milwaukee-Waukesha. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia and Milwaukee-Waukesha?

Rents in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia are indexed at 97.6 while Milwaukee-Waukesha is at 97.1 (national average = 100). Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.